Senin, 30 Desember 2019

Secure Act includes one critical tax change ‘that will send estate planners reeling’ - MarketWatch

On Dec. 20, President Trump signed into law the awkwardly named Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act (Secure Act). The new law is mainly intended to expand opportunities for individuals to increase their retirement savings. But it also includes one big anti-taxpayer change that will send some financially comfortable folks and their estate planners reeling. The Secure Act includes some other important tax changes that have nothing to do with retirement.

In several installments, MarketWatch will cover the changes that are most likely to affect individuals and small businesses.

No more age restriction on traditional IRA contributions

Before the Secure Act, you could not make contributions to a traditional IRA for the year during which you reached age 70 1/2 or any later year. (There’s no age restriction on Roth IRA contributions, and the Secure Act does not change that.)

New law: For tax years beginning after 2019, the Secure Act repeals the age restriction on contributions to traditional IRAs. So, for tax years beginning in 2020 and beyond, you can make contributions after reaching age 70½. That’s the good news.

Key point: The deadline for making a contribution for your 2019 tax year is April 15, 2020, but you cannot make a contribution for 2019 if you were age 70 1/2 or older as of Dec. 31, 2019. Thanks to the new law, you can make contributions for tax year 2020 and beyond.

Side effect for IRA qualified charitable distributions

After reaching age 70 1/2, you can make qualified charitable contributions of up to $100,000 per year directly from your IRA(s). These contributions are called qualified charitable distributions, or QCDs. Effective for QCDs made in a tax year beginning after 2019, the $100,000 QCD limit for that year is reduced (but not below zero) by the aggregate amount of deductions allowed for prior tax years due to the aforementioned Secure Act change. In other words, deductible IRA contributions made for the year you reach age 70 1/2 and later years can reduce your annual QCD allowance.

New age-72 start date for required minimum distributions from IRAs and retirement plans

Before the Secure Act, the initial required minimum distributions was for the year you turned age 70 1/2. You could postpone taking that initial payout until as late as April 1 of the year after you reached the magic age.

You generally must begin taking annual required minimum distributions (RMDs) from tax-favored retirement accounts (traditional IRAs, SEP accounts, 401(k) accounts, and the like) and pay the resulting income tax hit. However, you need not take RMDs from any Roth IRA(s) set up in your name.

Before the Secure Act, the initial RMD was for the year you turned age 70 1/2. You could postpone taking that initial payout until as late as April 1 of the year after you reached the magic age. If you chose that option, however, you must take two RMDs in that year: one by the April 1 deadline (the RMD for the previous year) plus another by Dec. 31 (the RMD for the current year). For each subsequent year, you must take another RMD by Dec. 31. Under an exception, if you’re still working as an employee after reaching the magic age and you don’t own over 5% of the outfit that employs you, you can postpone taking RMDs from your employer’s plan(s) until after you’ve retired.

New law: The Secure Act increases the age after which you must begin taking RMDs from 70 1/2 to 72. But this favorable development only applies to folks who reach 70 1/2 after 2019. So, if you turned 70 1/2 in 2019 or earlier, you’re unaffected. But if you will turn 70 1/2 in 2020 or later, you won’t need to start taking RMDs until after attaining age 72. As under prior law, if you’re still working after reaching the magic age and you don’t own over 5% of the employer, you can postpone taking RMDs from your employer’s plan(s) until after you’ve retired.

Key point: If you turned 70 1/2 in 2019 and have not yet taken your initial RMD for that year, you must take that RMD, which is for the 2019 tax year, by no later than 4/1/20 or face a 50% penalty on the shortfall. You must then take your second RMD, which is for the 2020 tax year, by Dec. 31, 2020.

Now for the bad news

Stricter rules for post-death required minimum distributions curtail ‘Stretch IRAs’: The Secure Act requires most non-spouse IRA and retirement plan beneficiaries to drain inherited accounts within 10 years after the account owner’s death. This is a big anti-taxpayer change for financially comfortable folks who don’t need their IRA balances for their own retirement years but want to use those balances to set up a long-term tax-advantaged deal for their heirs.

Before the Secure Act, the required minimum distribution (RMD) rules allowed you as a non-spouse beneficiary to gradually drain the substantial IRA that you inherited from, say, your grandfather over your IRS-defined life expectancy.

For example, say you inherited Grandpa Dave’s $750,000 Roth IRA when you were 40 years old. The current IRS life expectancy table says you have 43.6 years to live. You must start taking annual RMDs from the inherited account by dividing the account balance as of the end of the previous year by your remaining life expectancy as of the end of the current year.

So, your first RMD would equal the account balance as of the previous year-end divided by 43.6, which would amount to only 2.3% of the balance. Your second RMD would equal the account balance as of the end of the following year divided by 42.6, which translates to only 2.35% of the balance. And so, on until you drain the inherited Roth account.

As you can see, the pre-Secure Act RMD regime allowed you to keep the inherited account open for many years and reap the tax advantages for those many years. With an IRA, this is called the “Stretch IRA” strategy. The Stretch IRA strategy is particularly advantageous for inherited Roth IRAs, because the income those accounts produce can grow and be withdrawn federal-income-tax-free. So, under the pre-Secure Act rules, a Stretch Roth IRA could give you some protection from future federal income tax rate increases for many years. That’s the upside.

This development will have some well-off folks and their estate planning advisers scrambling for months (at least) to react.

Unfortunately, the Secure Act’s 10-year rule puts a damper on the Stretch IRA strategy. It can still work, but only in the limited circumstances when the 10-year rule does not apply (explained below). This development will have some well-off folks and their estate planning advisers scrambling for months (at least) to react. That’s especially true if you’ve set up a “conduit” or “pass-through” trust as the beneficiary of what you intended to be a Stretch IRA for your heirs.

Also see: Inheriting a parent’s IRA or 401(k). Here’s how the Secure Act could create a disaster

Key point: According to the Congressional Research Service, the lid put on the Stretch IRA strategy by the new law has the potential to generate about $15.7 billion in tax revenue over the next decade. 

Effective date: The Secure Act’s anti-taxpayer RMD change is generally effective for RMDs taken from accounts whose owners die after 2019. The RMD rules for accounts inherited from owners who died before 2020 are unchanged.

Who is affected?

The Secure Act’s anti-taxpayer RMD change will not affect account owners who drain their accounts during their retirement years. And account beneficiaries who want to quickly drain inherited accounts will be unaffected. The change will only affect certain non-spouse beneficiaries who want to keep inherited accounts open for as long as possible to reap the tax advantages. In other words, “rich” folks with lots of financial self-discipline.

The Secure Act’s anti-taxpayer RMD change also will not affect accounts inherited by a so-called eligible designated beneficiary. An eligible designated beneficiary is: (1) the surviving spouse of the deceased account owner, (2) a minor child of the deceased account owner, (3) a beneficiary who is no more than 10 years younger than the deceased account owner, or (4) a chronically-ill individual (as defined).

If your grandfather dies in 2020 or later, you can only keep the big Roth IRA that you inherit from him open for 10 years after his departure.

Under the exception for eligible designated beneficiaries, RMDs from the inherited account can generally be taken over the life or life expectancy of the eligible designated beneficiary, beginning with the year following the year of the account owner’s death. Same as before the Secure Act.

So, the Stretch IRA strategy can still work for an eligible designated beneficiary, such as an account owner’s much-younger spouse or recently born tot. Other non-spouse beneficiaries (such as an adult child, grandchild, niece or nephew) will get slammed by the new 10-year account liquidation requirement. So, if your grandfather dies in 2020 or later, you can only keep the big Roth IRA that you inherit from him open for 10 years after his departure. Bummer!

10-year rule specifics: When it applies, the new 10-year rule generally applies regardless of whether the account owner dies before or after his or her RMD required beginning date (RBD). Thanks to another Secure Act change explained earlier, the RMD rules do not kick in until age 72 for account owners who attain age 70 1/2 after 2019. So, the RBD for those folks will be April 1 of the year following the year they attain age 72.

Following the death of an eligible designated beneficiary, the account balance must be distributed within 10 years.

When an account owner’s child reaches the age of majority under applicable state law, the account balance must be distributed within 10 years after that date.

The bottom line: As you can see, the Secure Act includes both good and bad news for folks who don’t enjoy paying taxes. The new law includes more important tax changes that I’ve not covered here.

3 examples of new RMD rules for non-spousal retirement account beneficiaries

Example 1: Harold dies in 2020 and leaves his IRA to designated beneficiary Hermione, his sister, who was born eight years after Harold. Hermione is an eligible designated beneficiary. Therefore, the balance in the inherited IRA can be paid out over her life expectancy. If Hermione dies before the account is exhausted, the remaining balance must be paid out within 10 years after her death.

Example 2: Ingrid dies in 2020 and leaves her IRA to designated beneficiary Ignacio, her brother, who was born 12 years after Ingrid. Ignacio is not an eligible designated beneficiary because he is more than 10 years younger than Ingrid. The balance in the inherited IRA must be paid out within 10 years after Ingrid’s death.

Example 3: Jerry dies in 2020 at age 85. He lives his $2 million Roth IRA to his 24-year-old spouse Jasmine. Since Jasmine is an eligible designated beneficiary, the new 10-year rule does not apply to her. As a surviving spouse, she can retitle the inherited Roth account in her own name. Then she will not have to take any RMDs for as long as she lives. So, this is a situation where the Stretch IRA strategy still works well (although not quite as well as before the Secure Act for reasons that are too complicated to explain here).

Example 4: Kendrick dies on Dec. 15, 2019. He left his IRA to designated beneficiary Kelli, his beloved niece, who is 30 years younger than Kendrick. Because Kendrick died before 2020, the balance in the inherited IRA can be paid out over Kelli’s life expectancy under the pre-Secure Act RMD rules. If Kelli dies on or after 1/1/20, the balance in the IRA must be paid out to her designated beneficiary or beneficiaries or the heir(s) who inherit the account within 10 years after Kelli’s death.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMif2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm1hcmtldHdhdGNoLmNvbS9zdG9yeS9zZWN1cmUtYWN0LWluY2x1ZGVzLW9uZS1jcml0aWNhbC10YXgtY2hhbmdlLXRoYXQtd2lsbC1zZW5kLWVzdGF0ZS1wbGFubmVycy1yZWVsaW5nLTIwMTktMTItMzDSAU9odHRwczovL3d3dy5tYXJrZXR3YXRjaC5jb20vYW1wL3N0b3J5L2d1aWQvOTNDMEY1QjQtMkFFRi0xMUVBLUJFOEEtQkYwNDIwNjhEQUQ3?oc=5

2019-12-30 10:51:00Z
52780518904052

Tesla delivers first China-made Model 3s to its own workers - CNN

Fifteen employees of the electric carmaker become the first customers to receive Model 3s produced in China during a ceremony at the factory on Monday, according to Tesla. Wang Hao, general manager for Tesla China, said during the event that more cars will be delivered to workers over the next couple of days before other customers begin receiving them next month.
How Tesla's risky bet on making cars in China could pay off
The Shanghai plant was built in just 10 months and began trial production in October. The first batch of cars to roll off the assembly line began making their way to Tesla's dozens of experience centers in China last month, where potential customers were given the opportunity to test drive them. Tesla has been taking orders for Model 3s made in China since October 25.
"This is a happy gathering," the company wrote on Weibo, China's Twitter-like platform, where it also live-streamed the Shanghai event. "The delivery of China-made Model 3s to our beloved workers is to reward everyone's hard work this year."
One Tesla (TSLA) employee who received a car even proposed to his girlfriend at the ceremony. He lifted the car's hood, revealing flowers underneath, and said he wanted to give the vehicle to his girlfriend as a "gift" before asking her to marry him. (She appeared to say yes.)
An employee, left, proposes to his girlfriend with his newly delivered Tesla Model 3 in Shanghai on Monday.
Elon Musk's carmaker built the Shanghai factory to grow its business, pump out more cars and better target Chinese customers. The facility could also push production costs lower.
Right now, a Shanghai-built Model 3 has a starting price of 355,800 yuan ($51,000), about 2% cheaper than an imported model. Buyers of the locally made cars can also take advantage of government subsidies of nearly 25,000 yuan ($3,578), and are exempt from a car purchase tax, according to the company.
Tesla isn't new to the Chinese market — it's been delivering cars to people there since 2014. But Musk has touted the new factory as a "template for future growth." The company has said it wants to eventually make 500,000 cars a year in Shanghai.
It's also the first Tesla production plant built outside the United States. Musk recently announced that the company has plans to build another one in Berlin, taking the great electric car race to the manufacturing heart of Europe.
China, meanwhile, is the world's largest car market, though sales are slowing as the country grapples with broader economic troubles.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiQmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNubi5jb20vMjAxOS8xMi8zMC90ZWNoL3Rlc2xhLWNoaW5hLW1vZGVsLTMvaW5kZXguaHRtbNIBAA?oc=5

2019-12-30 10:51:00Z
52780519173343

The Decade of Debt: big deals, bigger risk - Reuters

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Whatever nickname ultimately gets attached to the now-ending Twenty-tens, on Wall Street and across Corporate America it arguably should be tagged as the “Decade of Debt.”

FILE PHOTO: A picture illustration shows a $100 banknote laying on $1 banknotes, taken in Warsaw, January 13, 2011. REUTERS/Kacper Pempel/File Photo

With interest rates locked in at rock-bottom levels courtesy of the Federal Reserve’s easy-money policy after the financial crisis, companies found it cheaper than ever to tap the corporate bond market to load up on cash.

Bond issuance by American companies topped $1 trillion in each year of the decade that began on Jan. 1, 2010, and ends on Tuesday at midnight, an unmatched run, according to SIFMA, the securities industry trade group.

In all, corporate bond debt outstanding rocketed more than 50% and will soon top $10 trillion, versus about $6 trillion at the end of the previous decade. The largest U.S. companies - those in the S&P 500 Index .SPX - account for roughly 70% of that, nearly $7 trillion.

Graphic: Long-term debt for S&P 500 here

What did they do with all that money?

It’s a truism in corporate finance that cash needs to be either “earning or returning” - that is, being put to use growing the business or getting sent back to shareholders.

As it happens, American companies did a lot more returning than earning with their cash during the ‘Tens.

In the first year of the decade, companies spent roughly $60 billion more on dividends and buying back their own shares than on new facilities, equipment and technology. By last year that gap had mushroomed to more than $600 billion, and the gap in 2019 could be just as large, especially given the constraint on capital spending from the trade war.

The buy-back boom is credited with helping to fuel a decade-long bull market in U.S. equities.

Graphic: S&P 500 shareholder payouts here

Meanwhile, capital expenditure growth has been choppy at best over 10 years. This is despite a massive fiscal stimulus package by the Trump administration, marked by the reduction in the corporate tax rate to 21% from 35%, that it had predicted would boost business spending.

Graphic: Capital expenditure of S&P 500 here

One byproduct of stock buy-backs is they make companies look more profitable by Wall Street’s favorite performance metric - earnings per share - than they would otherwise appear to be.

With companies purchasing more and more of their own stock, S&P 500 EPS has roughly doubled in 10 years. Meanwhile net profit has risen by half that, and far more erratically.

Graphic: S&P 500 earnings per share here

Graphic: Reported earnings for S&P 500 here

The corporate bond market has not only gotten bigger, it has gotten riskier.

With investors clamoring for yield in a low-rate world, debt rated only a notch or two above high-yield - or junk - bond levels now accounts for more than half of the investment-grade market, versus around a third at the dawn of the decade.

Graphic: BBB/Baa issuance spikes here

Reporting by Joshua Franklin and Kate Duguid in New York; Editing by Dan Burns and Dan Grebler

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMidmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJldXRlcnMuY29tL2FydGljbGUvdXMtZ2xvYmFsLW1hcmtldHMtZGVjYWRlLWNyZWRpdC90aGUtZGVjYWRlLW9mLWRlYnQtYmlnLWRlYWxzLWJpZ2dlci1yaXNrLWlkVVNLQk4xWVkwOVnSATRodHRwczovL21vYmlsZS5yZXV0ZXJzLmNvbS9hcnRpY2xlL2FtcC9pZFVTS0JOMVlZMDlZ?oc=5

2019-12-30 06:19:00Z
CBMidmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJldXRlcnMuY29tL2FydGljbGUvdXMtZ2xvYmFsLW1hcmtldHMtZGVjYWRlLWNyZWRpdC90aGUtZGVjYWRlLW9mLWRlYnQtYmlnLWRlYWxzLWJpZ2dlci1yaXNrLWlkVVNLQk4xWVkwOVnSATRodHRwczovL21vYmlsZS5yZXV0ZXJzLmNvbS9hcnRpY2xlL2FtcC9pZFVTS0JOMVlZMDlZ

Minggu, 29 Desember 2019

Tax-Free Portfolio Yielding 10% - Seeking Alpha

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. Tax-Free Portfolio Yielding 10%  Seeking Alpha
  2. Can I Retire Securely by Saving Only in an IRA?  The Motley Fool
  3. Retirement 2020: What to Watch for in the New Year  Barron's
  4. This new law will change the rules when it comes to retirement savings | Money Smart  KENS 5: Your San Antonio News Source
  5. Sweeping Changes to Retirement Savings Rules on Tap for 2020 | Rossi  nj.com
  6. View full coverage on Google News

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiR2h0dHBzOi8vc2Vla2luZ2FscGhhLmNvbS9hcnRpY2xlLzQzMTQyODQtdGF4LWZyZWUtcG9ydGZvbGlvLXlpZWxkaW5nLTEw0gFLaHR0cHM6Ly9zZWVraW5nYWxwaGEuY29tL2FtcC9hcnRpY2xlLzQzMTQyODQtdGF4LWZyZWUtcG9ydGZvbGlvLXlpZWxkaW5nLTEw?oc=5

2019-12-29 15:00:00Z
52780518904052

Beware of 2020's Stealth Social Security Cut - The Motley Fool

Many people spend years looking forward to turning 62. That's because 62 is the first age at which most workers can claim retirement benefits from Social Security, and a large fraction of older Americans choose to start getting monthly checks from Social Security as soon as possible.

If you're going to be eligible for Social Security for the first time in 2020, however, there's something you need to know. Under laws that took effect more than 35 years ago, the benefits that you'll receive will be less than what people in a similar position in 2019 received. That's because lawmakers back then dealt with potential financial difficulties for the program by instituting new rules that effectively reduced how much those hitting early retirement age will get from Social Security.

What lawmakers did to take away benefits now

Social Security has always been a dangerous issue to discuss in Washington, and lawmakers in the early 1980s knew that they were entering a potential minefield. Yet they also needed to ensure the long-term financial security of the program. As part of a compromise, Congress agreed to raise the full retirement age, which at the time was 65.

Two Social Security cards on top of a $100 bill.

Image source: Getty Images.

However, the provisions didn't take effect immediately. The intent of waiting was to ensure that those who were close to retirement wouldn't get punished by the law changes at a time at which it was too late for them to do anything about it.

Instead, increases to the full retirement age got implemented on a delayed basis. It went rose from 65 in two-month increments for those born between 1938 and 1942, and stayed at 66 for those born between 1943 and 1954. More recently, another set of two-month incremental increases began a few years ago for those born in 1955. Those increases will continue until those born in 1960 and later have a full retirement age of 67.

What that means for those turning 62 in 2020 is that their full retirement age will be 66 and eight months. That's up two months from the full retirement age of 66 and six months for those who turned 62 in 2019.

Just how much money are new Social Security recipients losing?

The consequences of full retirement age rising by two months aren't immense, which is why it's fair to characterize the move as a stealth Social Security cut. Over time, though, the slight reductions will add up.

As an example, say that you're turning 62 in 2020 and were an above-average earner throughout your career, therefore qualifying for a full retirement monthly benefit of $1,800 from Social Security. Because your full retirement age is 66 and eight months, retiring at 62 means that you're getting your benefits 56 months early. That will result in your getting a Social Security check each month equal to 71 2/3% of your full retirement amount, or $1,290.

However, someone who turned 62 in 2019 and had the same earnings history and full retirement age benefit would receive slightly more. Because the full retirement age applying here was 66 and six months, claiming at 62 is just 54 months early. The 2019 retiree got 72 1/2% of their full retirement monthly benefit, or $1,305. That's $15 per month higher.

You can't just wait it out

If you think you can avoid the problem by holding off longer before claiming your Social Security benefits, think again. The change in full retirement age affects your benefits no matter when you claim.

For example, say you wait until age 70 to claim. You'll get 40 months' worth of delayed retirement credits, which will boost your check by 26 2/3%. The monthly check will be $2,280. However, for the person who turned 62 in 2019 instead of 2020, the increase would be slightly greater, with 42 months adding up to a 28% boost. That makes the corresponding monthly check $2,304 -- $24 higher every month.

Cuts will continue

Those turning 62 in 2021 and 2022 will also have to deal with this Social Security cut, until the full retirement age finally maxes out at 67. However, some policy makers believe that further increases to Social Security's retirement age could be forthcoming. Staying aware of them is critical to make sure that you don't get any nasty Social Security  surprises.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiW2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZvb2wuY29tL3JldGlyZW1lbnQvMjAxOS8xMi8yOS9iZXdhcmUtb2YtMjAyMHMtc3RlYWx0aC1zb2NpYWwtc2VjdXJpdHktY3V0LmFzcHjSAV9odHRwczovL3d3dy5mb29sLmNvbS9hbXAvcmV0aXJlbWVudC8yMDE5LzEyLzI5L2Jld2FyZS1vZi0yMDIwcy1zdGVhbHRoLXNvY2lhbC1zZWN1cml0eS1jdXQuYXNweA?oc=5

2019-12-29 14:03:00Z
52780525607982

The Bedrock of Ultra-Low Yields Is at Risk - Bloomberg

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

The Bedrock of Ultra-Low Yields Is at Risk  Bloomberg
https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMicmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJsb29tYmVyZy5jb20vbmV3cy9hcnRpY2xlcy8yMDE5LTEyLTI5L3RoZS1iZWRyb2NrLW9mLXVsdHJhLWxvdy15aWVsZHMtaXMtYXQtcmlzay1hcy1maXNjYWwtdGlkZS10dXJuc9IBdmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJsb29tYmVyZy5jb20vYW1wL25ld3MvYXJ0aWNsZXMvMjAxOS0xMi0yOS90aGUtYmVkcm9jay1vZi11bHRyYS1sb3cteWllbGRzLWlzLWF0LXJpc2stYXMtZmlzY2FsLXRpZGUtdHVybnM?oc=5

2019-12-29 12:00:00Z
CAIiEFVgw4yViULlTlh9GYtKwmMqGQgEKhAIACoHCAow4uzwCjCF3bsCMIrOrwM

Can I Retire Securely by Saving Only in an IRA? - The Motley Fool

There's a reason 401(k) plans are regarded as a valuable retirement savings tool: Their generous annual contribution limits make it feasible for workers to retire with more than enough money to live on for decades.

Currently, the annual contribution limits for 401(k)s are $19,000 for workers under 50, and $25,000 for those 50 and older. In 2020, these limits are increasing to $19,500 and $26,000, respectively. Plus, employers that sponsor 401(k)s often match worker contributions to varying degrees, which means those who save in a 401(k) can often sock away more than what the annual limits allow for, since employer contributions don't count toward them.

There's just one problem with 401(k)s, though: Not everyone has access to one. In fact, an estimated 49% of private sector workers did not have the option to save in a 401(k) in 2014, as reported in 2018 by the National Institute on Retirement Security.

IRA sign up in the clouds with right arrow underneath it

IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.

If you don't have the option to save for retirement in a 401(k), you may be wondering if an IRA will suffice. The annual contribution limits for IRAs are much lower than those of 401(k)s: just $6,000 for workers under 50, and $7,000 for those 50 and over. And, those limits are holding steady going into 2020, so workers won't get an added opportunity to save in the coming year. The good news, however, is that if you manage your IRA wisely, you could potentially retire quite comfortably with that money alone.

Maximizing your IRA

If you're limited to saving for retirement in an IRA, financial security could very well be yours if you do three key things:

  1. Start saving at a young age.
  2. Max out every year.
  3. Invest your savings wisely.

Many people delay their retirement savings for years after entering the workforce, largely because they graduate college with debt, but also because they figure they have plenty of time to save for their golden years. But if you start funding your IRA at age 22, and you retire around age 67, you'll have a solid 45 years to invest your savings for added growth. And if you're willing to live frugally so you can max out year after year, you'll wind up socking away quite a bundle.

Now, let's talk investments. Loading up on stocks in your IRA is generally the way to go, because that's where you'll usually be looking at the most aggressive growth. With an IRA, you can choose to invest in individual stocks, or in mutual funds that are stock-based. A mix of both could serve you well, but if you're not well-versed in vetting individual companies, mutual funds may be the way to go. That said, opting for index funds over actively managed mutual funds is a great way to keep your investment fees to a minimum, thereby getting to retain more of your returns.

Assuming you stick to this plan, there's a good chance your IRA will manage to generate an average annual 7% return over a 45-year period, since that's a bit below the stock market's average. Now, let's assume that you max out your account for 45 years at the current annual contribution limits between the ages of 22 and 67. When we apply that 7% return, you're left with -- wait for it -- $1.75 million. That's certainly enough for a decent retirement, because if you withdraw from that amount of savings at an annual rate of 4%, which many financial experts recommend, you'll be looking at $70,000, and that doesn't include the money you get from Social Security or other sources.

So there you have it: An IRA is enough to buy you financial security during your golden years. You just need to make sure you fund it for as many years as possible, contribute as much as you can, and invest it wisely.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiXmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZvb2wuY29tL3JldGlyZW1lbnQvMjAxOS8xMi8yOS9jYW4taS1yZXRpcmUtc2VjdXJlbHktYnktc2F2aW5nLW9ubHktaW4tYW4taXJhLmFzcHjSAWJodHRwczovL3d3dy5mb29sLmNvbS9hbXAvcmV0aXJlbWVudC8yMDE5LzEyLzI5L2Nhbi1pLXJldGlyZS1zZWN1cmVseS1ieS1zYXZpbmctb25seS1pbi1hbi1pcmEuYXNweA?oc=5

2019-12-29 11:36:00Z
CAIiEFeeYmsl5ZF8Q4wfMSGz65gqFQgEKgwIACoFCAowgHkwoBEw2vCeBg