Jumat, 16 Agustus 2019

Fed may not have the firepower to save the economy if a recession is coming - CNBC

President Donald Trump wants the Federal Reserve to help head off a feared economic slowdown, but it's not clear the central bank has enough firepower left to do so.

Besides, some economists say, there's really not much reason for the Fed to act any more aggressively than it already plans, considering that growth signs remain intact, though dinged a little bit by worries over tariffs and a slowdown in some other areas outside the U.S.

"Federal Reserve officials have some explaining to do when it comes to cutting interest rates and driving down the yields on safe investments like Treasury bonds and notes to near record low levels," Chris Rupkey, chief financial economist at MUFG, said in a note following a raft of positive economic data on Thursday.

"They don't need to explain their rate cuts to voters or to the Trump economics team, but they will have to explain themselves to the history books. The Fed's interest rate cut looks more out of line than ever given the strength of the economy," he added. "Recession? What recession? That's what we want to know."

Still, Trump continues to clamor for rate cuts and the market anticipates at least two more before the end of the year. That will leave the Fed with only scant room to cut further, as it currently is targeting its benchmark rate between 2% and 2.25%.

The question, though, is whether the Fed can even save the U.S. from a soft patch or worse. Wall Street saw its worst day of the year Wednesday, as the Dow industrials fell 3% while the bond market, albeit briefly, saw the 2-year Treasury note yield rise above the 10-year, a sign that has pointed to recessions in the past.

By itself, the Fed may have a hard time stemming such fears, following a decade in which the central bank has been pretty successful in stepping in to save the day during market queasiness.

Behind the curve

"We're in a little bit of new water," said Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management. "The bond market is telling you, 'Listen stock market, you're being too ebullient, you're being too optimistic. You're putting too much faith in a Fed that is behind the curve and too much faith in a president who doesn't actually hold all the cards.'"

The Fed in 2019 has sought to reposition itself from an intention to continue raising rates this year to holding a "patient" stance before changing policy to one that now is actively assuring markets that it will do what is needed to keep the decade-old expansion going.

However, its 25 basis point rate cut on July 31 has been treated with relative ambivalence — whereas such a move normally would cause the yield curve to steepen, the gap actually has contracted to the point of the inversion that so startled markets Wednesday.

"The key thing we're watching and the key thing we tell our clients to watch is you need the long end of the bond market to go up. That's when you'll know it's safe to go back in the water," Shalett said. "As long as the bond market is worried about recession or worried about the Fed being behind the curve, there's not a lot the Fed can do."

A need to be 'very, very aggressive'

Steepening the yield curve might require some more dramatic action than merely quarter-point cuts.

The dreaded inversion quickly reverted and the curve between the 2- and 10-year steepened somewhat Thursday. However, a round of disappointing economic data, or, more likely, another Trump acceleration of the trade war via tweet could cause market havoc again.

"It's very remarkable that on July 31 when the Fed cut interest rates, the 2-10 spread was over 20 basis points, and after they cut it went negative within two weeks or so," said economist Michael Pento, founder of Pento Portfolio Strategies. "That's telling me the Fed has to be very, very aggressive — maybe a 75 basis point cut would be the minimum to get the long-term rate rising."

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell testifies during a House Financial Services Committee hearing on "Monetary Policy and the State of the Economy" in Washington, July 10, 2019.

Erin Scott | Reuters

Traders are not anticipating that kind of move, though the chances of a 50 basis point reduction in September moved up to 33% Thursday, according to the CME's tracker of market probability. The market is projecting the funds rate to keep falling until it hits around 1.04% in early 2021, which would represent a full point cut and then some from the current target range.

The worries among some Fed officials is that if they start cutting now, there won't be much left if a more serious downturn hits.

"The Fed can act quickly, but the low level of interest rates limits how much stimulus they can provide," Nomura economist Lewis Alexander said in a note.

"The Fed could overestimate the strength of the economy and keep policy too 'tight,'" he added. "This
has happened, on several occasions in the past. That said, the Fed seems intent on avoiding this mistake. "

Indeed, markets expect central bankers to remain confident they can keep the economy moving, even if doubts are rising in the markets and at the White House.

"Markets can move pretty far pretty fast and get ahead of themselves, so I guess I don't think there's a necessity to rush to ease policy," said Bill English, former head of monetary affairs at the Fed and now a professor at the Yale School of Management. "Powell has been very clear that they're going to be looking at the data and be data driven, and they're going to do the right thing to keep the expansion going."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/15/trump-wants-fed-rate-cuts-unclear-if-they-would-help.html

2019-08-16 10:54:48Z
52780354826503

CEO of Cathay Pacific resigns following pressure by Beijing on the Hong Kong carrier over staff participation in protests - Stuff.co.nz

The CEO of Cathay Pacific Airways has resigned following pressure by Beijing on the Hong Kong carrier over participation by some of its employees in anti government protests.

Cathay Pacific said Rupert Hogg resigned Friday "to take responsibility" following "recent events."

Cathay Pacific Airbus A330-300. The CEO of the airline has resigned following pressure by Beijing on the Hong Kong carrier over participation by some of its employees in anti government protests.

SUPPLIED

Cathay Pacific Airbus A330-300. The CEO of the airline has resigned following pressure by Beijing on the Hong Kong carrier over participation by some of its employees in anti government protests.

The company chairman, John Slosar, said in a statement the airline needed new management because events had "called into question" its commitment to safety and security.

On Monday, Hogg threatened employees with "disciplinary consequences" if they took part in "illegal protests.'

READ MORE:
* Hong Kong protesters call for boycott of Kiwi-made Mulan over star's support for police
* Hong Kong protesters to withdraw all their money from ATMs
* Travellers heading to Hong Kong told to check insurance policies
* Hong Kong protesters apologetic, but determined to fight on
* Satellite photos appear to show Chinese troops near Hong Kong

Last week, China's aviation regulator said Cathay Pacific employees who "support or take part in illegal protests, violent actions, or overly radical behavior" are banned from staffing flights to mainland China.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/asia/115077334/ceo-of-cathay-pacific-resigns-following-pressure-by-beijing-on-the-hong-kong-carrier-over-staff-participation-in-protests

2019-08-16 09:57:00Z
52780354905007

Kamis, 15 Agustus 2019

Bernie Madoff whistleblower says GE is a bigger fraud than Enron - CNN

Markopolos said in a report released Thursday that GE was hiding nearly $40 billion of losses in its insurance business. He said this is the largest case of accounting fraud he and his team have investigated.
"In fact, GE's $38 billion in accounting fraud amounts to over 40% of GE's market capitalization, making it far more serious than either the Enron or WorldCom accounting frauds," Markopolos wrote in the report, referring to the scandals that eventually helped bankrupt energy giant Enron in 2001 and long-distance telco WorldCom in 2002.
GE strongly denied Markopolos' allegations.
"The claims made by Mr. Markopolos are meritless," GE said in a statement, adding that it "has never met, spoken to or had contact with Mr. Markopolos, and we are extremely disappointed that an individual with no direct knowledge of GE would choose to make such serious and unsubstantiated claims."
Markopolos made several comparisons to Enron in his report and also on a new website with the URL www.gefraud.com. He accused GE of using what he dubbed "the 'GEnron' playbook."
"GE has been running a decades-long accounting fraud by only providing top line revenue and bottom line profits for its business units and getting away with leaving out cost of goods sold" in addition to various other expenses," Markopolos claims.
He also took issue with how GE accounts for its majority stake in oil services firm Baker Hughes and accused the company of hiding more than $9 billion in losses in its separately traded BHGE (BHGE) unit.
Shares of GE (GE) tumbled 13% on the news. The stock is still up 7.5% this year though, as new CEO Larry Culp has been busy selling off non-core assets to shore up cash.
Those sales may also help turn GE around by making the notoriously complex company leaner and more focused on the power and renewable energy, aviation and healthcare businesses that continue to have solid growth prospects.
GE could sell its stake in dozens of startups
GE was not immediately available for further comment about the Markopolos claims. But in its statement, the company took issue with Markopolos' allegations about accounting in its insurance unit, saying that "current reserves are well-supported for our portfolio characteristics."
GE also defended how it accounts for its BHGE stake and added that it has "a strong liquidity position" -- with ample cash and access to credit lines.
The company noted that "Mr. Markopolos openly acknowledges that he is compensated by unnamed hedge funds" and added that these funds are "financially motivated" to profit from short selling the stock, a move that could push shares lower and "create unnecessary volatility."
Still, Markopolos points out in his report that he is not making any investment recommendations, adding that "GE's current and past employees are the victims here as are GE's lenders, vendors, and customers all of whom have to deal with the aftermath of an accounting fraud."
Markopolos is far from the only one critical of GE's accounting.
Activist shareholder firm CtW said in an April letter to GE's lead independent board director Thomas Horton that "misguided capital allocation strategies and multiple shareholder derivative lawsuits...cast doubt over the company's financial health."
CtW also took issue with GE's continued relationship with auditing firm KPMG, which has been reviewing GE's books for more than a century. Several other activist shareholders also urged GE to dump KPMG, and GE said in December that its audit committee will consider making a change -- but not until 2020 at the earliest.
KPMG declined to comment about its business relationship with GE because of "client confidentiality requirements."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/15/investing/general-electric-harry-markopolos-whistleblower-accounting/index.html

2019-08-15 15:53:00Z
52780354017667

Here's why Madoff whistleblower says GE is a bigger fraud than Enron - Yahoo Finance

Shares of General Electric are falling today after Madoff whistleblower Harry Markopolos targeted the company in a new report, saying it has been hiding the extent of its problems in fraudulent financial statements. Yahoo Finance's Ethan Wolff-Mann talks with Julie Hyman and Adam Shapiro as well as Lending Tree's chief economist, Tendayi Kapfidze and Ramsey Smith, ALEX.fyi Founder.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://finance.yahoo.com/video/heres-why-madoff-whistleblower-says-154837794.html

2019-08-15 15:48:00Z
52780354017667

A global recession may be coming a lot sooner than anyone thought - CNN

Perspectives Sven Henrich
Call it a major hangover. The reversal in tariffs did not come from a position of strength. It came as a result of global economic reality sinking in and crushing US markets.
Turns out trade wars are not easy to win and the global growth picture is not looking good. Last week, the UK announced negative GDP growth for the past quarter. This week, it's Germany announcing shrinking GDP with its 10-year bond hitting a record negative 0.62% yield. Then there's Europe seeing negative industrial production, and China announcing its lowest industrial production growth in 17 years.
The collapse in global bond yields has been a theme since October of last year, with 10-year US Treasury bonds dropping to 1.6% from their October 2018 high of 3.23%. Now that the two-year/10-year Treasury yield curve has inverted, the recession alarm bells are ringing. Why? Because every single recession in the past 45 years has seen a yield curve inversion preceding it.
History suggests that on average a recession begins 22 months after a yield curve inversion. It's not until about 18 months after an inversion that the stock market turns negative.
Yet Bank of America Merril Lynch numbers indicate that we have less time. For the 10 yield curve inversions since 1956, the S&P 500 peaked within approximately three months of the inversion six times. Following the other four, the S&P 500 took 11 to 22 months to peak.
Twenty-two months of growth vs. three months? That's quite a big gap.
Both of these historical studies suggest there is room for markets to make new highs in the next few months. In fact, one can imagine several scenarios on how these new highs could come about.
Central banks could embark on emergency interest rate cuts and reintroduce quantitative easing programs to force more cash into equities again. A sudden end to a trade war, with an attempt to save face by both sides, could certainly spark a sustained global relief rally that may end up averting or delaying a recession.
Indeed, the Trump administration, eager to avoid a recession ahead of the 2020 election, may find itself in a position to end the trade war sooner rather than later. But the administration is still faced with several historic miscalculations of its own making. The massive tax cuts of 2017 have produced little in the form of growth other than a temporary sugar high. Growth is slowing. Long gone are the promises of 4% GDP growth. In fact, growth is looking to drop below 2% in lieu of a trade deal. The only thing that has been growing are deficits, which are on pace to hit $1 trillion this year already.
All of these are signs that the risk of a global recession is a clear and present danger.
This is a very tricky environment for investors to navigate through. History suggests there is time to take advantage of future rallies to prepare for the next recession and raise cash before a major market downturn does unfold. But global economic data suggests a global recession may come a lot sooner than anyone anticipated.
And this reveals an uncomfortable truth: We've never faced a recession with so much debt and so little Fed ammunition available and with negative rates still in effect in many countries. There's no playbook for this. Historic data may be of little predictive use.
A sudden end to the trade deal may be imperative — without it we don't have much time before the next recession begins.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/15/perspectives/global-recession-bond-yield-inversion/index.html

2019-08-15 14:28:00Z
52780353924734

GE Is New Target of Madoff Whistleblower - The Wall Street Journal

Harry Markopolos, who warned securities regulators about the Madoff investment scheme, is taking issue with how GE accounts for its long-term-care insurance holdings and for its Baker Hughes oil and gas business. Photo: Michael Bucher/The Wall Street Journal

An accounting expert who raised red flags about Bernie Madoff ’s Ponzi scheme has a new target: General Electric Co. GE -7.14%

In a research report posted online Thursday, Harry Markopolos alleges the struggling conglomerate has masked the depths of its problems, resulting in inaccurate and fraudulent financial filings with regulators. The report, which numbers more than 170 pages and was reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, is a mixture of detailed financial analysis and sweeping claims.

Mr. Markopolos said, in an interview ahead of the report’s release, his group found GE’s insurance unit will need to bolster its reserves by $18.5 billion in cash and faulted the way the company is accounting for its oil-and-gas business. All told, he said, the accounting problems amount to $38 billion, or 40% of the conglomerate’s market value.

“GE stands behind its financials. We operate to the highest level of integrity in our financial reporting and we have clearly laid out our financial obligations in great detail,” a GE spokeswoman said in an email before the report was published. “While we can’t comment on the detailed content of a report that we haven’t seen, the allegations we have heard are entirely false and misleading.”

Mr. Markopolos said he and his colleagues are working with an undisclosed hedge fund, which is betting GE’s share price will decline. Mr. Markopolos’s group gave the investor access to the research prior to publication and will receive a portion of any trading proceeds. He declined to identify the hedge fund. The group also is sharing its findings with securities regulators, hoping to collect a cash reward as part of a whistleblower program, Mr. Markopolos said.

The group’s research indicates that GE is short on working capital—a key measure of liquidity—and that its cash situation is far worse than disclosed in its regulatory filings.

GE said it hasn’t been contacted by Mr. Markopolos and that the group’s report was produced to help short sellers profit by creating volatility in GE’s shares. “We will not be distracted by this type of meritless, misguided and self-serving speculation and neither should anyone in the investor community,” the GE spokeswoman said.

The Boston-based investor-turned-investigator warned the Securities and Exchange Commission about the Madoff investment scheme years before it became public, but was ignored. In a more recent campaign, Mr. Markopolos helped expose a foreign-currency trading scandal at several banks. He has helped spawn a cash-for-tips whistleblower industry.

GE is already under investigation by the SEC and Justice Department for potential accounting issues that have come to light in the past two years related to its insurance holdings and problems in its power division. The company has denied accounting fraud in response to lawsuits and said it is cooperating with investigators. GE has said it is considering switching auditors after using KPMG LLP for more than a century.

The Markopolos group said it plans to present its report to the SEC and to meet with federal prosecutors and investigators about its findings. In the report, the group says some information will be given exclusively to law enforcement.

An SEC spokesman declined to comment.

After two difficult years, GE has shown signs of stability in its business this year and recently nudged higher its financial guidance for the first time in years. From the perspective of an investor betting against the share price, much of the decline in GE stock has already happened. Shares are close to $9, where they have spent much of 2019. The share price was above $30 at the beginning of 2017 and near $7 at the end of 2018.

The Markopolos group includes John McPherson, co-founder of MMS Advisors, forensic accountants specializing in the insurance industry. The group worked for seven months to analyze GE’s accounting.

Mr. Markopolos said he is going public with the report now because the group just finished its work. It had been working on another insurance case when GE’s insurance problems caught its eye, he said.

The group claims GE’s long-term-care insurance holdings are a bigger liability than the company is letting on. The report estimates GE will need to boost its insurance reserves by $18.5 billion in cash and take a $10.5 billion charge because of an accounting change required by 2021.

Those figures are on top of a $15 billion reserve boost already taken by GE over seven years to cover its exposure to long-term care policies, which cover expenses like nursing homes and assisted living. The policies have proved to be a problem for many insurers. The companies drastically underestimated the number of future claims and how long people would draw on the coverage before dying. 

Mr. McPherson said the group found issues with GE’s long-term care insurance by reviewing statutory insurance filings, financial documents required by state regulators that require different accounting than corporate financial statements.

The group went back a decade and, because GE’s long-term care business involved reinsuring policies issued by other insurers, it also examined the underlying filings for those other insurers.

The report claims that policy premiums paid to GE are low compared with what rivals typically receive and that GE isn’t receiving any premiums at all on more than a quarter of policies, because those contracts are considered paid in full. The group says that, even after the $15 billion boost, GE’s reserves are well below what would be expected for such a troubled group of policies.

GE in the early years front-loaded gains from the long-term-care business by collecting premiums when policyholders were young, the group claims, but failed to properly record reserves as the covered population aged and claims ran at higher levels than originally expected.

In March, GE executives hosted a conference call to assure investors they had a handle on the insurance business. GE said that it planned to push to raise policy premiums and shift investments to boost returns and that it had adequate reserves to cover expected claims. “We believe our assumptions are appropriate in the aggregate,” Tim Kneeland, head of the insurance unit, said at the time.

The Markopolos group also alleges that GE’s ownership of oil-and-gas business Baker Hughes isn’t being properly accounted for and that the company should have booked $9.6 billion of losses on the investment. Last year GE recorded a $2.2 billion loss on the sale of part of its Baker Hughes stake, reducing its ownership from 62.5% to 50.2%.

In SEC filings, GE has disclosed that selling below 50% will trigger it to stop reporting Baker Hughes’s financial results as part of its own and record its loss on the rest of its investment. GE said its paper loss on the remaining investment was about $7.4 billion as of July 24, according to the company’s 10-Q report.

Mr. Markopolos said that the Baker Hughes stake is now “strictly an investment” and that GE as of 2018 has been improperly holding back from recording the loss, thus inflating its financial results. GE should be simply recording the value of its investment in the company, Mr. Markopolos said, a change he said could strain GE debt agreements.

GE responds that, as a majority shareholder of Baker Hughes it is required to report consolidated results for Baker Hughes, under generally accepted accounting principles. GE says it is providing more transparent reporting by including Baker Hughes’s revenues and costs and assets and liabilities, rather than just giving a value for the investment.

Share Your Thoughts

What questions should authorities be asking of General Electric? Join the conversation below.

Write to Thomas Gryta at thomas.gryta@wsj.com and Mark Maremont at mark.maremont@wsj.com

Copyright ©2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.wsj.com/articles/ge-is-new-target-of-madoff-whistleblower-11565866617

2019-08-15 13:24:00Z
52780354017667

Trump economy nearing a recession? - MSNBC

Wall Street took a battering Wednesday, suffering its worst day so far in 2019, the sharpest indication yet of an approaching recession. With his re-election campaign on the line, what levers does President Trump have to keep the U.S. economy healthy? And was the "great Trump economy" a lie in the first place?

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/trump-economy-nearing-a-recession-66161221616

2019-08-15 11:32:35Z
52780353924734