Senin, 05 Agustus 2019

HSBC axes CEO Flint in shock shift to speed up strategy - One America News Network

FILE PHOTO: 2019 World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos
FILE PHOTO: CEO John Flint of HSBC attends the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, January 24, 2019. REUTERS/Arnd Wiegmann

August 5, 2019

By Sumeet Chatterjee and Lawrence White

HONG KONG/LONDON (Reuters) – HSBC <HSBA.L> ousted John Flint as chief executive after just 18 months in a shock move the chairman of Europe’s biggest bank said was needed to speed up progress on priority areas such as the turnaround of its U.S. business.

The CEO’s exit was a result of differences of opinion with chairman Mark Tucker over Flint’s more tentative approach to cutting expenses and setting revenue targets for senior managers to boost profit growth, a person familiar with the matter said.

HSBC disclosed the departure of Flint, 51, alongside its half-year results on Monday as it forecast a gloomier outlook for its business, with an escalation of a trade war between China and the United States, an easing monetary policy cycle, unrest in its key Hong Kong market and Brexit.

HSBC, which makes more than 80% of its profit in Asia, said that its global commercial banking unit head Noel Quinn will be interim chief executive.

Shares in HSBC, which fell nearly 14% during Flint’s tenure, were down 2% in London, even though it reported a 16% rise in profit and a revealed a share buyback of up to $1 billion.

Flint, who previously ran London-headquartered HSBC’s retail and wealth management business, was chosen as CEO in February 2018 in the first major decision by Tucker, who told Reuters:

“It’s the right time for change, and doing it clearly and decisively from a position of strength is very important.”

A key difference with Tucker was over Flint’s efforts to turn around HSBC’s under-performing U.S. business, the person familiar with the matter said. HSBC declined to comment.

Tucker, who became HSBC’s first externally appointed chairman when he joined HSBC’s board in late 2017, said that the search for a new CEO, which will include both internal and external candidates, could take up to a year.

(Graphic: HSBC shares under John Flint – https://tmsnrt.rs/2MCBpRO)

HUAWEI HEAT

Flint’s exit also followed weeks of adverse Chinese media coverage over HSBC’s role in the arrest of Huawei Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou.

China’s Global Times ran an editorial on Friday saying it ‘feels heat on Huawei CFO case’, suggesting HSBC had erred in cooperating with U.S. authorities and it could face penalties.

“Our business operations in China continue as normal,” Tucker told analysts on a conference call when asked whether the bank faced blacklisting in China over the Huawei situation.

HSBC executives at the time of his appointment saw Flint as a safe pair of hands and a natural successor to mentor and previous CEO Stuart Gulliver.

Outlining his strategy in June last year, Flint set out plans to invest $15-$17 billion in the next three years in areas including technology and China.

“We have been uninspired by the “business as usual” strategy,” analyst Ed Firth at broker KBW said.

“We suspect that any new CEO is still more likely to be internal, but will need a more dynamic approach to improving underperforming areas of the business,” he said.

U.S. WOES

HSBC said it no longer expects to achieve the targeted 6% return on tangible equity (ROE) by 2020 in the U.S., where it has struggled for years to build scale and compete.

That missed U.S. goal is still below the overall group aim of getting to more than 11% ROE by 2020.

HSBC hired Citigroup veteran Michael Roberts in July to head its U.S. business, in a renewed effort to turn it around.

The U.S business is not “getting the proper returns”, Chief Financial Officer Ewen Stevenson told Reuters, adding the unit has also been hit by the change in the monetary policy cycle.

HSBC’s investment banking business has also struggled in recent years as it lost a string of senior executives and saw U.S. rivals cash in on booming domestic stock markets.

Revenues in HSBC’s global banking and markets division fell by 3% in the first half compared with the same period last year.

REVENUE RISK

HSBC’s pretax profit for the first six months of 2019 rose to $12.41 billion from $10.71 billion in the same period a year earlier, helped by a surge in retail banking and Asia revenues.

“Interest rates in the US dollar bloc are now expected to fall rather than rise, and geopolitical issues could impact a significant number of our major markets,” HSBC said.

The U.S.-China trade war has taken its toll on trade-focused banks like HSBC and rival Standard Chartered <STAN.L>, which last week warned of an impact on its business customers from the escalating tensions.

Tucker played down the impact of protests in Hong Kong against an extradition bill which have evolved into a broader anti-government backlash and said HSBC remained confident about the future of the Asian financial center.

Analysts had been watching closely to see whether the bank would announce a fresh buyback, as a failure to do so would have been read as a sign of mounting caution by HSBC’s management.

Prior to the latest buyback announcement, HSBC had purchased more than $6 billion of its own shares since 2016.

(Reporting by Sumeet Chatterjee in Hong Kong, Lawrence White in London and Aditya Soni in Bengaluru; Additional reporting by Anshuman Daga in Singapore; Editing by Nick Zieminski, Richard Pullin, Muralikumar Anantharaman and Alexander Smith)

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.oann.com/hsbc-says-ceo-john-flint-to-step-down/

2019-08-05 09:22:30Z
52780345778567

Asia markets sink as the Chinese yuan tumbles - Yahoo News

Multiple rounds of tit-for-tat tariffs between the world's top two economies have already battered trade (AFP Photo/Paul J. RICHARDS, Ed Jones)

Asian markets plummeted Monday as the Chinese yuan fell sharply, days after US President Donald Trump's vow to impose fresh tariffs on goods from China sent trade war fears soaring.

Trump's announcement, which came on Thursday, means virtually all of the $660 billion in annual merchandise trade between the world's two biggest economies will be subject to punitive tariffs, with the latest duties due to take effect September 1.

The news saw all three major Wall Street indices slump to their lowest levels since June, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq recording their worst weekly losses of 2019 on Friday.

In China, the yuan dropped to its lowest level to the dollar since August 2010, fuelling speculation that Beijing was devaluing its currency to support exporters and offset Trump's latest threat to hit $300 billion in Chinese goods with 10 percent tariffs.

The US leader regularly accuses the Chinese central bank of artificially weakening the yuan -- charges long denied by Beijing.

The onshore yuan tumbled to 7.0307 against the dollar -- its lowest level since 2008 -- while the more freely traded offshore yuan tumbled to 7.1085, breaching the 7.0 level which investors see as a key threshold in the currency's value.

Multiple rounds of tit-for-tat tariffs between the world's top two economies have already battered trade, with China's American imports shrinking 30 percent in the first half of the year.

Beijing has vowed to hit back if Washington goes ahead with its latest threat, while news that demand for US exports had weakened underscored concern that trade was becoming a trouble spot for economies worldwide.

- 'A lot messier' -

"China is likely to drag out their response and retaliate in many ways against the US trade measures," warned Edward Moya, senior market analyst at OANDA.

Negotiators from both nations are expected to reconvene in Washington in early September for another round of talks after last week's discussions in Shanghai, but investors remain nervous, Moya said.

"Financial markets are still working on pricing in a complete collapse of trade talks amongst the Chinese and Americans," he said.

"The base case still remains for a deal to get done, but talks are likely to get a lot messier before we see anything... that resembles a deal."

The yuan's depreciation spurred a sell-off across Asian markets.

Hong Kong lost more than three percent before staging a modest recovery as pro-democracy protesters targeted the financial hub's transport network in a citywide strike aimed at forcing concessions from its embattled pro-Beijing government.

Tokyo shed 1.7 percent while Shanghai fell 1.6 percent. Singapore dropped 1.8 percent while Taipei, Seoul and Manila were also down.

European markets also extended a pre-weekend slump in early trade. London and Paris dropped 1.1 percent while Frankfurt sank 1.0 percent.

- Key figures around 0700 GMT -

Tokyo - Nikkei 225: DOWN 1.7 percent at 20,720.29 (close)

Hong Kong - Hang Seng: DOWN 2.7 percent at 26,194.08

Shanghai - Composite: DOWN 1.6 percent at 2,821.50 (close)

London - FTSE 100: DOWN 1.1 percent at 7,324.76

Pound/dollar: DOWN at $1.2111 from $1.2162 at 2100 GMT Friday

Euro/dollar: UP at $1.1119 from $1.1106

Dollar/yen: DOWN at 106 yen from 106.59 yen

Brent North Sea crude: DOWN 94 cents at $60.95 per barrel

West Texas Intermediate: DOWN 67 cents at $54.99 per barrel

New York - Dow: DOWN 0.4 percent at 26,485.01 (close)

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.yahoo.com/news/asia-markets-sink-chinese-yuan-tumbles-035245712--finance.html

2019-08-05 08:34:00Z
CBMiWWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnlhaG9vLmNvbS9uZXdzL2FzaWEtbWFya2V0cy1zaW5rLWNoaW5lc2UteXVhbi10dW1ibGVzLTAzNTI0NTcxMi0tZmluYW5jZS5odG1s0gFdaHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnlhaG9vLmNvbS9hbXBodG1sL2FzaWEtbWFya2V0cy1zaW5rLWNoaW5lc2UteXVhbi10dW1ibGVzLTAzNTI0NTcxMi0tZmluYW5jZS5odG1s

John Flint: HSBC chief executive out in top-level reshuffle - BBC News

The chief executive of HSBC has stepped down after the bank said it needed a change in leadership to address a "challenging global environment".

John Flint is giving up the role he has held for a year-and-a-half "by mutual agreement with the board".

He will immediately cease his day-to-day responsibilities at HSBC, but will help with the transition as Noel Quinn takes over as interim chief executive.

Chairman Mark Tucker thanked Mr Flint for his "commitment" and "dedication".

However, he said: "In the increasingly complex and challenging global environment in which the bank operates, the board believes a change is needed to meet the challenges that we face and to capture the very significant opportunities before us."

HSBC made the surprise announcement as it reported a 15.8% rise in pre-tax profit to $12.4bn (£10.2bn) for the six months to 30 June.

Mr Flint, who has worked at HSBC for 30 years, said: "I have agreed with the board that today's good interim results indicate that this is the right time for change, both for me and the bank."

The 51-year-old ran the bank's retail and wealth management business before taking over as chief executive last year. At that time, Mr Flint was seen as a safe choice for the top job.

Commenting on the current environment, HSBC said "the outlook has changed".

It said that US interest rates were now expected to fall rather than rise and "geopolitical issues could impact a significant number of our major markets".

It added: "In the near term, the nature and impact of the UK's departure from the European Union remain highly uncertain."

'Good leaver'

Mr Flint has a 12-month notice period, but it is not clear when his departure date will be, because he has "agreed to remain available to HSBC".

HSBC has also granted Mr Flint "good leaver" status, which means he will be entitled to any stock options that vest after he exits the bank, provided he does not work at a competitor for two years.

The bank said it has begun a search to find a new chief executive and "will be considering internal and external candidates".

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/business-49230568

2019-08-05 06:41:21Z
52780345778567

China lets the yuan drop to 7 against the dollar, its lowest in a decade - CNN

The yuan weakened sharply after the People's Bank of China set its daily reference rate for the currency at 6.9225, the lowest rate since December. China's central bank sets a "band" every day within which the yuan's value is only allowed to move 2% up or down.
The central bank said that it is fully capable of keeping the yuan "reasonable and balanced," adding in a statement that Monday's weakness was mostly because of "trade protectionism and new tariffs on China." President Donald Trump announced a new round of tariffs on the country last week.
Devaluing the yuan is one way China has of retaliating against Trump's tariffs, but it's fraught with risk.
The market took the Chinese central bank's decision to lower the fixing rate that much as a "message of intent" to Trump, said Chris Weston, head of research at Pepperstone Group, in a research note.
He added that the yuan's depreciation will trigger fears about capital flight from China, along with a subsequent tightening of financial conditions in the Chinese economy.
In mainland China, one US dollar now buys about 7.03 yuan. In trading outside of China, where the yuan moves more freely, it stands at 7.07 to the dollar. Earlier, it had slipped to a record low offshore.
This is how China controls its currency
In its statement, China's central bank said it would take targeted measures as necessary to crack down on speculation and stabilize market expectations.
The symbolically important benchmark of 7 was last crossed during the 2008 financial crisis.
Citigroup strategist Gaurav Garg saw the decision to "unleash" the exchange rate as a potential response to the trade tensions that "may further complicate the US-China negotiations."
"US authorities have been sensitive to currency moves," he wrote in a research note. "They have on multiple occasions blamed currency manipulation to dampen the impact of trade tariffs and have insisted on currency stability as an important part of any agreement between the US and China."
Markets across Asia tumbled in early trading on fears about the trade tension.
Japan's Nikkei dropped 1.7% and South Korea's Kospi (KOSPI) lost 2.6%. The Shanghai Composite Index (SHCOMP) fell 1.6%. n Hong Kong, where protest leaders called on people to participate in strikes across the city, the Hang Seng Index (HSI) fell as much as 3.1%, the biggest drop since October.
"Risk aversion had certainly been the latest theme for markets, one to weigh on both Asia equities and currencies," said Jingyi Pan, a market strategist for IG Group. "Trade jitters linger for Asia markets going into the fresh week."
Trump ratcheted up his country's trade war with China last week when he announced plans Friday to slap a 10% tariff on $300 billion worth of goods. That means effectively all Chinese exports to the United States will soon be taxed.
Beijing, meanwhile, said it was ready for a fight.
Here are some of the other big moves on Asian markets at 3:00 p.m. Hong Kong time.
  • HSBC (HBCYF) shares that are listed in Hong Kong dropped 1.5% after the British banking giant announced John Flint will step down as chief executive. HSBC said a change was needed because of an "increasingly complex and challenging global environment."
  • Hang Seng Bank, a unit of HSBC and one of Hong Kong's largest lenders, tumbled 3.8%. In an earnings report, the bank cited a "a challenging operating environment" and slowing economic growth in the city. It forecast full-year GDP growth for Hong Kong to reach between 1% and 1.5%, down from from last year's 3%. "Downshifts in retail sales and trade growth signal that the economic environment will remain challenging," the bank said.
  • Last week, the S&P 500 index (INX) and the Nasdaq Composite Index (COMP) both posted the worst week for the year, down 3.1% and 3.9% respectively. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIEW) was down 2.6% for the week.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/04/investing/asian-market-latest-yuan/index.html

2019-08-05 07:36:00Z
52780345840537

Minggu, 04 Agustus 2019

What you should know about bonds: Prices riding 38-year run but won't defy gravity forever - USA TODAY

Much has been made of the stock market's bull-market cycle reaching the 10-year mark recently. But bonds arguably have been on a general upward trend for much longer.

Bond prices have risen, and yields have declined, for most of the past four decades, with only a few significant setbacks along the way. It's not likely this will change any time soon, especially with the Federal Reserve cutting interest rates again.

No wonder investors have poured money into bonds and bond funds, though they should be careful not to become complacent. 

Bonds are essentially standardized, tradable loans that investors make to government entities or corporations in return for interest payments or yield. They have been so predictable for so long that investors probably could use a refresher course on the risks.

It also helps to take a fresh look at popular misconceptions about bonds in general and bond funds in particular.

Myth: Bond prices don't fall much

Bond prices have been steady, or rising, for a long time so it's easy to forget that prices can go in either direction. Bonds sometimes do decline, and sharply. For example, long-term government bonds tumbled more than 10% in both 2009 and 2013.

When bond prices fall in unison, it's often because interest rates are rising, as the two move inversely. Bond prices in general have been in a lengthy upswing since late 1981, reflecting the long decline in interest rates and inflation over that span. But higher rates will materialize eventually, and we could be much closer to the long-term lows than to the peaks.

Want a side hustle?: 55% of Americans want a side hustle: Here's how to start

Bond prices also drop when issuers, especially corporations, look like they might have trouble making interest and principal payments. That hasn't happened much lately, after a decade of economic growth. Bond default rates now are less than half their long-term average, noted J.P. Morgan Asset Management.

But credit worries eventually will resurface. When they do, the prices of some bonds will stumble.

At any rate, many investors probably don't appreciate these risks. Both bond and stock investments represent important parts of a balanced portfolio, with bonds providing more income and stability and stocks, more growth potential. But bonds, too, can fluctuate in price.

A lot more cash has flowed into bond mutual funds and exchange-traded funds this year than has been withdrawn, suggesting investors aren't too concerned about the risks. By contrast, investors on balance have pulled more cash out of stock funds, according to the Investment Company Institute, the fund-industry trade group.

Be wary of hoaxes: Don’t Be Duped by These Phone and Email Scams

Bear Market is a term that sends fear into Wall Street and investors. What does it mean? And how does it affect both Wall Street and Main Street? Adam Shell explains.

Myth: Fed cuts will propel bond prices

It's easy to assume that Fed rate cuts help bond investors, but that's not necessarily the case.

The central bank directly affects short-term rates like those paid on bank deposit accounts and money-market funds, as well as rates on credit cards and many other types of loans. Prices for long-term bonds, by contrast, are influenced much more by inflation and inflationary expectations.

Granted, the Fed cuts rates when it thinks the economy could be slowing, like now, and inflation often eases at such times. But if investors perceive that the Fed might stoke inflation by cutting interest rates, they could respond by selling bonds, pushing down their prices.

Over the past decade of economic growth, inflation has been mild, averaging 1.6% annually, owing largely to the modest pace of the expansion, noted Standard & Poor's in a late July report. Even going back 25 years, the number is about the same, 1.7% annually.

This explains why bonds and bond funds still can deliver decent real returns even with yields of just 2% to 6% or so, depending on the category. (Municipal bonds, which pay tax-exempt interest, tend to pay the lowest yields.) But higher inflation, eventually, remains a distinct possibility.

Myth: Funds riskier than bonds

Many investors prefer individual bonds because they know the date when a particular issue will mature, and the price. That's not the case with bond mutual funds, which continually add new holdings to the portfolio and thus don't have a set maturity. Investors who desire the certainty of a fixed pay-off date tend to favor individual bonds.

But that doesn't mean bond funds are necessarily more risky. Portfolios provide more diversification, or safety in numbers, than one or a handful of bonds. If a corporation or municipality got into financial hot water, it wouldn't pull down a diversified portfolio by much. But if you were concentrated in a bond that went belly up, you could lose heavily.

"The vast majority of investors are better served by low-cost mutual funds ... particularly in the case of municipal and corporate bonds," said the Vanguard Group in a report. "Holding an individual bond to maturity primarily confers an emotional, rather than economic, benefit."

Credit risk and the need to diversity aren't so critical with government bonds, especially those issued by the federal government. But they are important with bonds sold by corporations and many municipalities — cities, counties and state governments.

Credit risk is easy to overlook when the economy is expanding, as it has been over the past decade. But it will become more relevant again during the next recession.

Incidentally, it's easy to buy bonds or funds through either full-service or discount brokerages, sometimes with just a few keystrokes on your phone or computer.

With funds, you can buy into a broadly diversified portfolio for just a couple thousand dollars, if not less. Buying a mix of individual bonds requires considerably more money.

Funds also are the more common choices in workplace 401(k) retirement plans.

Myth: Bonds cheaper than funds

This can be true in some cases, but it's difficult to generalize.

With individual bonds, you don't pay portfolio-management fees or other expenses (nor sales charges or "loads," which are levied by some funds). Yet fund costs have declined over the years, especially on index funds and exchange-traded funds.

The typical bond fund now charges 0.48% a year on average — $4.80 for every $1,000 investment — roughly half the level of 20 years ago, according to the Investment Company Institute. Improved economies of scale and increased competition largely explain this improvement, which also has been apparent with stock funds. Many types of bond funds are much cheaper to own, such as fixed-income exchange-traded funds, with average annual expenses of just 0.16%.

Besides, fund managers usually can buy and sell bonds at much lower cost than individuals can, reflecting their greater purchasing power, trading acumen, access to the best issues and so on. Many bonds, especially municipals, carry bid/asked price spreads for retail buyers.

Also, bond-fund managers often can reinvest interest payments more efficiently and quickly. Individuals might need to park those dollars in a low-yielding money-market fund until they have enough cash to buy a new bond. Fund managers don't need to wait.

In short, the differential between individual bonds and cost-effective funds isn't all that wide, and it sometimes favors the latter.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/08/04/bonds-have-been-roll-38-years-but-prices-may-fall-eventually/1915135001/

2019-08-04 15:22:00Z
52780345500872

Should You Claim Social Security at 70? - The Motley Fool

The tricky thing about filing for Social Security is that you're not limited to a single age in doing so. You're allowed to claim benefits as early as age 62, and while you technically don't have to file by 70, there's no financial reason to wait past that point. As such, 70 is generally considered the latest age to take benefits -- but it is the right time for you?

Why file for Social Security at 70?

Your monthly Social Security benefits are calculated based on how much you earned during your highest-paid 35 years of wages, and you're entitled to your full monthly benefit once you reach full retirement age. That age, depending on your year of birth, is either 66, 67, or somewhere in between. Now as mentioned earlier, you're allowed to file for benefits sooner, but for each year you claim Social Security ahead of full retirement age, your benefits will be reduced, and in most cases, on a permanent, lifelong basis.

Older man cooking

IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.

On the other hand, you also get the option to delay benefits past full retirement age, and boost them by 8% for each year you hold off. This incentive runs out at age 70, but if you're looking at a full retirement age of 67 and you file at 70 instead, you get a 24% increase in benefits that remains in effect for the rest of your life.

Clearly, that's a pretty good incentive to file for Social Security at 70. But in some cases, waiting that long doesn't make sense.

When 70 is the wrong age to file

Though claiming Social Security at 70 will increase your monthly benefits, it won't necessarily increase your lifetime benefit -- meaning, the total you collect from Social Security all-in. The longer you end up living, the more filing at 70 makes sense. And while you can't predict your own life expectancy, you can use your health nearing retirement as a guidance point. If your health is terrible, you're generally better off filing for Social Security early or on time. But if your health is great, and you have reason to believe you'll live a long life, then filing at 70 could pay off.

Imagine you're entitled to a monthly benefit of $1,500 at age 67. Waiting until 70 to claim Social Security will raise each monthly payment you get to $1,860, but you'll also collect 36 fewer payments in the process. At that point, you'll need to live until age 82-1/2 to break even -- meaning, to come away with the same lifetime total regardless of whether you file at 67 versus 70 -- which means that if you don't expect to live that long, filing at 70 is a bad idea.

Another reason you might claim Social Security before age 70? You've lost your job, can't find a new one, and don't have enough savings to pay your bills. At that point, you're better off taking benefits sooner than racking up dangerous credit card debt to pay your living expenses.

Finally, you might take benefits earlier than age 70 if you're secure financially, but simply want the money to travel or enjoy retirement when you're on the younger side. For example, if you have more than enough savings come age 65 to pay your senior living expenses for 30 years or longer, but you want your Social Security income to fund a number of expensive trips, then why not go for it? You've earned it, and you're apt to have more energy for that sort of thing at 65 than at 70.

The fact that you get the choice of when to file for Social Security is a good thing in theory. Still, it's not an easy decision. If you're thinking of claiming benefits at 70, take your health into account, and only wait that long if you believe you have a decent lifespan ahead of you. Otherwise, it may be worth collecting a lower monthly benefit, but increasing your chances of walking away with a higher lifetime total from Social Security.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.fool.com/retirement/2019/08/04/should-you-claim-social-security-at-70.aspx

2019-08-04 12:49:00Z
CAIiEMmKNuacs7YvsL9OmaxoruQqFQgEKgwIACoFCAowgHkwoBEw2vCeBg

10 Social Security Figures Every Worker Should Know - The Motley Fool

Social Security is our nation's most successful social program, at least in the words of presidential hopeful, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) -- and the data certainly backs up this statement. After all, more than 63 million people each month, 70% of which are retired workers, are receiving a monthly benefit check.

But as you may know, it's also a program that most workers generally misunderstand. Just take a gander at any Social Security survey for confirmation. If you're currently in the workforce and expect to receive a Social Security benefit when you retire, here are 10 figures you need to know.

A person tightly gripping their Social Security card between their thumb and index finger.

Image source: Getty Images.

1. $1 trillion in revenue per year

First of all, you should understand just how massive the Social Security program has become. Last year, Social Security generated $1 trillion in annual revenue for the first time in its history, with the bulk of this income ($885 billion) deriving from the 12.4% payroll tax on earned income. The remainder came from the taxation of Social Security benefits (which I'll touch on a bit later on), and interest income earned on the program's nearly $2.9 trillion in asset reserves. These asset reserves are invested in special-issue federal bonds that earn interest.

2. 22.1 million people kept out of poverty

Social Security has proven to be an incredibly effective tool at keeping seniors, as well as the long-term disabled, out of poverty. An analysis from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found that 22.1 million people were being kept out of poverty each year solely as a result of their Social Security payout, including over 15 million retired workers. Without a monthly Social Security payout, the elderly poverty rate would more than quadruple to over 40%.


Related Articles

3. Your full retirement age (probably 67)

It's also imperative that workers know their full retirement age (FRA). Your full retirement age is the age at which the Social Security Administration deems you eligible to receive 100% of your monthly benefit, as determined by your birth year. Claiming benefits before your FRA means accepting a permanent reduction to your monthly payout, whereas claiming after your FRA can actually increase your monthly benefit above 100%. Most future retirees will have an FRA of 67 years, although you can find your unique full retirement age with this handy Social Security Administration table.

A senior man counting a fanned pile of cash in his hands.

Image source: Getty Images.

4. $1,471 average monthly benefit

You should understand that Social Security isn't going to have you rolling in the dough. The average retired worker was bringing home $1,470.83 a month, as of June 2019. Although this works out to more than the federal poverty level on an annual basis, the grand total for a full year is "only" $17,650, when rounded. As you'll see in the next point, it's not designed to be a primary source of income.

5. 40% is the expected wage/salary replacement level

According to the Social Security Administration, your retired worker payout is designed to replace about 40% of your working wages or salary. Although this percentage could be a bit higher for lower lifetime income workers, and lower for more well-to-do workers, the point is that Social Security benefits aren't expected to be more than a secondary source of income. In other words, Social Security income doesn't take the place of your need to save and invest for the future.

6. 62% of retired workers lean on their payout for at least half of their income

As you probably guessed, few seniors actually follow the guideline on replacement wages. The Social Security Administration found that 62% of retired workers lean on the program to supply at least half of their monthly income, with 34% reliant on Social Security for virtually all of their income (90%-plus). As you'll see in an upcoming figure, overreliance on Social Security for your monthly income can be dangerous.

A person filling out a Social Security benefits application form.

Image source: Getty Images.

7. 4% of retired workers claim Social Security at age 70

Retired worker benefits can be claimed at age 62, or any point thereafter, with benefits growing by approximately 8% per year for each year that an individual holds off on taking their payout, up until age 70. Despite this dangling carrot of an incentive, a majority of retired workers claim benefits early (at or before age 64), thereby permanently reducing their monthly payout to less than 100%. Meanwhile, only 4% of retired workers wait as long as possible (age 70) to maximize their monthly payout. Interestingly enough, a recent study found age 70 to be the single best age to take Social Security benefits, albeit there's still no one-size-fits-all claiming age for everyone.

8. About half of all senior households pay federal tax on their benefits

Ready or not, there's a pretty good chance you'll be paying federal tax on a portion of your Social Security benefits. If your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI), plus one-half of your Social Security benefits, exceeds $25,000, or $32,000 if you're a couple filing jointly, you can be taxed on up to half of your benefits at the federal ordinary income rate. Further, using the same MAGI plus one-half benefits formula above, if you're above $34,000 as a single filer, or $44,000 as a couple filing jointly, up to 85% of you benefits could be subject to federal taxation. Today, around half of all senior households owe tax on their benefits, according to The Senior Citizens League.

9. 13 states tax Social Security benefits

Here's the "but wait, there's more" moment. In addition to federal taxation, 13 states also tax Social Security benefits to some varied degree. Quite a few offer very generous income exemption levels, such as Missouri, where a single filer and couple can earn up to $85,000 and $100,000, respectively, before facing any state-level tax on their Social Security benefits. Even states that have mirrored the federal tax schedule are becoming a bit tax-friendlier. Nevertheless, if you live in one of these 13 states, you could be hit with double taxation on your Social Security payout.

Scissors cutting through a one hundred dollar bill.

Image source: Getty Images.

10. 2035 is when the program could exhaust its asset reserves

Lastly, as promised, being overly reliant on Social Security could come back to haunt you. The newest annual Social Security Board of Trustees report estimates that the program's nearly $2.9 trillion in asset reserves will be completely exhausted by 2035, with a number of demographic changes resulting in larger net-cash outflows with each passing year. Although Social Security won't go bankrupt -- its recurring sources of revenue prevent it from insolvency -- the trustees' report projects that, sans congressional involvement, benefits could be cut by up to 23% for retired workers in 2035 to ensure payouts through 2093. This is even more reason Social Security should be considered an ancillary, not primary, source of income during retirement.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.fool.com/retirement/2019/08/04/10-social-security-figures-every-worker-should-kno.aspx

2019-08-04 10:06:00Z
CAIiEA7ffKAbcu4ZzKykt1gcnV4qFQgEKgwIACoFCAowgHkwoBEw2vCeBg