Minggu, 14 Juli 2019

Huawei Plans Extensive Layoffs in the U.S. - The Wall Street Journal

People attend a tech conference in Paris in May. Huawei is planning to make job cuts at its U.S. operations. Photo: Marlene Awaad/Bloomberg News

Huawei Technologies Co. is planning extensive layoffs at its U.S. operations, according to people familiar with the matter, as the Chinese technology giant continues to struggle with its American blacklisting.

The layoffs are expected to affect workers at Huawei’s U.S.-based research and development subsidiary, Futurewei Technologies, according to these people. The unit employs about 850 people in research labs across the U.S., including in Texas, California and Washington state.

Huawei declined to comment. The exact number of layoffs couldn't be determined, but one of the people said they were expected to be in the hundreds. Some of Huawei’s Chinese employees in the U.S. were being given the option of returning home and staying with the company, another person said.

Futurewei employees have faced restrictions communicating with colleagues in Huawei’s home offices in China following the May 16 Commerce Department decision to put Huawei on its so-called entity list, which blocked companies from supplying U.S.-sourced technology to Huawei without a license, according to these people.

Several employees have already been notified of their dismissal, while additional planned cuts could be announced soon, these people said.

The blacklisting has limited Huawei’s ability to buy critical U.S. components and software for its products, which include its smartphones and cellular base stations that are popular outside the U.S. Huawei bought $11 billion worth of American technology last year.

A reprieve for Huawei appeared to be in sight after President Trump said at the Group of 20 summit at Osaka, Japan, last month that he would allow some tech exports to the company to resume. Beijing sees an easing of restrictions on Huawei as a precondition for any trade deal with Washington.

Huawei’s Chinese Phones Are Also American

The U.S. blacklisting of Huawei is cutting off American businesses from a big client. WSJ’s Dan Strumpf looks at the American technology that has powered the Chinese company’s smartphones. Photo composite: Sharon Shi

On Tuesday, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said the U.S. would begin granting export licenses to Huawei suppliers whose sales to the Chinese company don’t put national security at risk. Meanwhile, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has been urging U.S. suppliers to apply for licenses.

The U.S. says Huawei gear poses a security risk because the giant telecommunications company has no choice but to comply with demands from China’s authoritarian government to conduct cyber espionage on its behalf. Huawei says it is an independent company with no government ties and has challenged U.S. officials to provide evidence of espionage.

Huawei is the world’s largest maker of telecommunications equipment and the No. 2 vendor of smartphones, ahead of Apple Inc. and behind only Samsung Electronics Co. But despite its dominant position in many markets, the company is effectively blocked from selling its gear to major U.S. carriers following a 2012 Congressional report that said it could be a security risk. Huawei has denied this.

In the U.S., Huawei’s roughly 1,500 employees mainly handle equipment sales to rural wireless carriers across the country, while others do research for an array of technologies at Futurewei. Huawei employs more than 180,000 people world-wide.

But the Commerce Department’s May 16 entity listing complicated Futurewei’s ability to continue working with its home offices in China, because Futurewei’s R&D efforts could amount to U.S.-sourced technology under Huawei’s entity listing, these people said.

Under the listing’s rules, “any unlicensed transfer of any technology of any sort by anyone from the U.S. to Huawei is prohibited,” said Kevin Wolf, a partner at the law firm Akin Gump who was a Commerce Department official during the Obama administration.

In addition to the U.S. blacklisting, Huawei is also contesting a pair of indictments by the U.S. on charges related to intellectual-property theft and violations of U.S. sanctions on Iran. Meanwhile, U.S. officials have been lobbying allies around the world to block Huawei from participating in their 5G network rollouts. That effort has had mixed success.

Analysts say the entity listing poses the most serious threat to Huawei given its reliance on American chips and other technology. Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei said last month that the measure would cost Huawei $30 billion in lost revenue this year and next. And the company’s international smartphone sales fell 40% in the month after the blacklisting was announced, though the decline has since moderated. Huawei had more than $100 billion in revenue last year, according to its annual report.

On Friday, Huawei Chairman Howard Liang said at a news conference at the company’s Shenzhen headquarters that the company has yet to see any benefit from Mr. Trump’s pledge to roll back export restrictions and said the Chinese firm should be removed from the entity list altogether.

Huawei smartphones run on Google’s Android operating system and among other restrictions, the entity listing prevents Google from licensing the software on future Huawei phone models. Though Huawei is working on its own replacement operating system, known as Hongmeng, Mr. Ren said in a recent interview with a French newspaper that it was originally designed for telecommunication networks and said “we don’t have a clear plan yet” for developing a software ecosystem around the operating system.

Write to Dan Strumpf at daniel.strumpf@wsj.com

Copyright ©2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.wsj.com/articles/huawei-plans-extensive-layoffs-in-the-u-s-11563071144

2019-07-14 02:27:00Z
52780331835039

Baby born at 7-Eleven at 7:11 on July 11 weighed 7 pounds, 11 ounces - WTHR

Published:

Updated:

ST. LOUIS (WTHR) – Wow, talk about a crazy coincidence!

Rachel Langford had been seeing the numbers seven and 11 throughout her pregnancy but she didn’t realize it was foreshadowing.

At 7:11 on the evening of July 11, Langford gave birth to J’amie Brown inside a Missouri 7-Eleven.

Her birth weight? Seven pounds and 11 ounces.

“I thought it was weird at first, and I didn’t know that (the numbers) meant so much,” Landgford told CNN. “A lot of the times (during the pregnancy) I would look at the clock and it was 7:11.”

Langford, who also has a 6-year-old son, plans to tell the convenience store chain about J’amie’s timely birth.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.wthr.com/article/baby-born-7-eleven-711-july-11-weighed-7-pounds-11-ounces

2019-07-14 02:15:35Z
CBMiVmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lnd0aHIuY29tL2FydGljbGUvYmFieS1ib3JuLTctZWxldmVuLTcxMS1qdWx5LTExLXdlaWdoZWQtNy1wb3VuZHMtMTEtb3VuY2Vz0gFaaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cud3Roci5jb20vYXJ0aWNsZS9iYWJ5LWJvcm4tNy1lbGV2ZW4tNzExLWp1bHktMTEtd2VpZ2hlZC03LXBvdW5kcy0xMS1vdW5jZXM_YW1w

Sabtu, 13 Juli 2019

Barneys explores possible July bankruptcy filing as it grapples with rent hike at Manhattan flagship - CNBC

Luxury retailer Barneys New York is making preparations for a bankruptcy filing that could come as soon as this month, people familiar with the matter tell CNBC.

Barneys, which is facing a liquidity crunch spurred by a rent hike at its Manhattan flagship, has engaged law firm Kirkland & Ellis and financial advisers a M-III Partners to assist with the potential preparations, the people said. The advisers are exploring a range of options that include bankruptcy, as well as ones that would help it avoid a bankruptcy filing, such as a sale or securing further financing, the people said.

The people therefore cautioned that while Barneys is exploring a bankruptcy filing, one is far from certain.

A spokesperson for Barneys told CNBC, "At Barneys New York, our customers remain our top priority and we are committed to providing them the excellent services, products, and experiences they have come to expect." The spokesperson added that, "our Board and management are actively evaluating opportunities to strengthen our balance sheet and ensure the sustainable, long-term growth and success of our business."

Barneys is just one of many department stores that is struggling as shoppers now buy online or from brands directly. Nordstrom is trading nearly $20 a share lower than a $50 a share buyout offer it rejected two years ago as too low. Saks-owner Hudson's Bay Company is considering going private after its shares fell nearly 50% in the year through June. Shares of Macy's are down 40% through the past year.

Department stores are also battling to balance waning sales and a costly store-base, which for Barneys includes more than 10 namesake stores in New York, California,Chicago, Massachusetts, Las Vegas, Seattle and Pennsylvania.

Manhattan has proved particularly onerous.

Rent at Barneys' flagship on Madison Avenue, owned by Ashkenazy Acquisition Corp, jumped from roughly $16 million to approximately $30 million in January, nearly wiping out its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, CNBC previously reported.

Many retail landlords in Manhattan's Midtown made investments in their property when retail was stronger, either by buying at high prices or taking out large loans predicated on high valuations.  The rent they charge is a reflection of those valuations. As retail has struggled and sales have slumped, the disconnect has hurt both tenant and landlord.

Ralph Lauren closed its Fifth Avenue store in 2017, while Lord & Taylor closed its Fifth Avenue flagship in January.

Barneys, which has roughly $850 million in sales, extended the term of its credit line by $50 million in April, in hopes of a lifeline. Still, the credit agreement with existing lender Wells Fargo and new lender, TPG Sixth Street Partners, has not been enough to siphon the losses.

Barneys has been backed by Perry Capital, the fund run by Richard Perry, since 2012.  Perry closed his fund four years later, citing industry and market headwinds.

Perry Capital has since largely existed as a "zombie fund," in which it has owned Barneys but has not put more money into it.

Barneys dates to 1923, when Barney Pressman opened a men's discount clothing store on Seventh Avenue and 17th Street. In the 1960s, Barney's son Fred helped transition from a discount store to a luxury retailer. Barneys soon made its imprint on New York luxury fashion, building on its foothold in menswear and introducing designers like Giorgio Armani.

The people requested anonymity because the information is confidential.  M-III did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A message left with Perry Capital out of business hours was not returned. 

Reuters first reported the possible bankruptcy plans. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/13/barneys-explores-possible-july-bankruptcy-filing-grapples-with-manhattan-rent-hike.html

2019-07-13 20:16:38Z
52780332001804

Amazon Prime Day is every day for Amazon.com - Quartz

Did you hear? Amazon Prime Day is coming! It’s almost here! Two days of epic deals! More than one million products on sale! The robots are readying! Lady Gaga is headlining!

Amazon Prime Day, for the uninitiated, is Amazon’s annual blow-out shopping event. Amazon first tried out Prime Day in July 2015, to mark its 20th birthday. The shopping holiday is a consummate American experience—think Black Friday, after-Christmas sales—and Amazon, two decades into the retail game, felt confident it could create one all its own.

“Step Aside Black Friday – Meet Prime Day,” read Amazon’s press release introducing the event.

The first Prime Day was a success, of course. Amazon was a giant—the giant—of online retail, and when it declared a shopping holiday, people paid attention. Over the past four years, Prime Day has grown from an Amazon-led festivity to summer’s biggest shopping event. Other retailers, eager or perhaps desperate to compete, have launched counter-programming, and in doing so legitimized Prime Day more than Amazon ever could.

This year Target, Best Buy, and Walmart are among the retailers entering the fray, with deals on everything from swimsuits to laptops to vacuum cleaners that run before, during, and after Prime Day. “Amazon Prime Day is no longer just about Amazon,” says Michelle Skupin, a spokesperson for coupons site RetailMeNot. “Amazon Prime Day is no longer just about Amazon,” says Michelle Skupin, a spokesperson for coupons site RetailMeNot.

Prime Day is still mostly about Amazon. Investment firm Cowen estimates 63 million US households, or half of all households in the country, subscribe to Prime, Amazon’s $119-a-year membership that includes free two-day shipping, streaming music, streaming video, and unlimited photo storage, among other perks. More than two-thirds of those Prime households plan to shop on Amazon for Prime Day(s) 2019, according to market research firm The NPD Group, compared to 15% who plan to check out deals from both Amazon and other retailers.

More to the point, every day is Prime Day for Amazon. The company commands 47% of US retail e-commerce sales, according to industry researcher e-Marketer, nearly eight times the share of e-Bay, Amazon’s closest competitor. While the rest of retail is still scrambling to compete on free two-day shipping, Amazon plans to make one-day delivery standard.

Since Amazon launched its first Prime Day its quarterly sales have more than doubled.

Prime Day isn’t really about the one million product sales or that new line of Lady Gaga cosmetics. It’s the illusion that for online shopping to be all about Amazon is a special event, rather than the norm. When Prime Day ends, 63 million US households will still have their Prime memberships pulling them back to Amazon.com, where the perks and deals last all year long.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://qz.com/1665390/amazon-prime-day-is-every-day-for-amazon-com/

2019-07-13 16:33:00Z
52780331807362

Amazon Prime Day Deals Start Today (Yes Today) Act Now to Get a $24.99 Fire TV Stick 4K & $29.99 Fire Tablets - Cord Cutters News, LLC

Amazon Prime Day won’t officially start until Monday, July 15th but that has not stopped Amazon from offering early deals. Starting today if you asked your Amazon Alexa smart speaker what “whats my deals” you will be able to get early access to some Prime Day deals. When I asked my Alexa what my deals are it offered me a $22 Echo Dot along with a $29.99 Fire 7 Tablet to name a few of the deals. All of the deals my Amazon Echo offered ended up being cheaper than the listing on Amazon.com

Update: Amazon is offering the Fire TV Stick 4K on sale for $24.99 (typically $49.99) through Echo speakers. Keep asking for more deals until your Echo offers you the $24.99 Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K. (This deal will likely be live on Amaozn.com tomorrow.)

One warning when you look at these deals in your Amazon Orders page it will still show the item at full price. If you click on the Order Details you will see the Order summary listing the discounted price. Example:

Amazon has also announced that starting on Sunday, July 14th select Prime Day deals will go live on Amazon.com early.

Wondering what you should expect from Prime Day 2019? Here are all the deals Amazon has announced so far:

Amazon Devices

Electronics

Video Games

Smart Home

Household Essentials

Fashion

 

Home & Kitchen

Home Improvement 

Major Appliances

Amazon Brands and Exclusives

Beauty, Health & Personal Care

Toys & Baby Products

 Sports & Outdoors

Automotive, Tools, Lawn & Garden

Did you know we have a YouTube Channel? Every week we have a live Cord Cutting Q&A, and weekly Cord Cutting recap shows exclusively on our YouTube Channel!

Please follow us on Facebook and Twitter for more news, tips, and reviews. Need cord cutting tech support? Join our Cord Cutting Tech Support Facebook Group for help.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cordcuttersnews.com/amazon-prime-day-deals-start-today-yes-today-act-now-to-get-a-24-99-fire-tv-stick-4k-29-99-fire-tablets/

2019-07-13 13:48:00Z
52780329877700

Report of $5 billion Facebook settlement with FTC draws criticism - Axios

A man walks by reporters and TV cameras
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Photo: Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images

News that the Federal Trade Commission has approved a roughly $5 billion fine against Facebook for privacy violations prompted instant outcry from some critics and lawmakers.

Why it matters: The FTC decision could have consequences for Facebook's billions of users — and frame the next stage of a global debate over how to regulate consumer privacy. A consensus that the settlement is weak would provide more ammo for proponents of new privacy laws — whereas an assessment that the penalties are serious would strengthen the hands of those who oppose new regulation.

Flashback: It has been 474 days since the FTC confirmed that it was investigating the company, following revelations that a researcher associated with consultancy Cambridge Analytica had swept up Facebook user data in a digital dragnet.

  • Critics charged that Facebook had violated a previous 2012 settlement with the FTC that required it to take more care when it came to user privacy, allowing the agency to levy greater penalties.
  • Now, the agency's three-commissioner Republican majority has reportedly signed off on a roughly $5 billion settlement, with its two Democrats voting against the deal.
  • The Department of Justice has to review the settlement before it becomes final.

What they're saying: The race to spin the potential settlement started as soon as the news broke.

Capitol Hill Democrats and advocates of aggressive new privacy regulation panned the deal.

  • Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) called the $5 billion fine, the largest in FTC history, a "tap on the wrist" for the mammoth Facebook.
  • Presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said the settlement was a "victory for Facebook."
  • Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) said that with "the FTC either unable or unwilling to put in place reasonable guardrails to ensure that user privacy and data are protected, it’s time for Congress to act.”

Industry groups and allies praised it.

  • "The FTC’s Facebook fine is unprecedented and will undoubtedly motivate better privacy practices by all businesses," said Carl Szabo, the general counsel of trade association NetChoice, in a statement.

What we don't know: The exact terms of the settlement, which is expected to put restrictions of some kind on Facebook's behavior that go beyond just the financial penalty.

  • Both the FTC and Facebook declined to comment.

Facebook's stock popped on the news, suggesting the markets didn't view it as a major blow to the social giant.

  • The company itself estimated that the fine in the case could be as high as $5 billion earlier this year.

Yes, but: Even with the FTC case settled, plenty of challenges will confront Facebook in the United States and abroad. That includes scrutiny from state attorneys general, the possibility of future antitrust action and a new tax on its revenues in France that has drawn scrutiny from the Trump administration.

The big picture: The fine has been hanging over the privacy debate in Washington for months, raising the question of whether regulators have enough power to rein in companies like Facebook.

  • Advocates for strong privacy laws have said the FTC should be able to pursue more significant penalties against companies on a first offense, for example, or have a broader ambit to write regulations.

But momentum has seriously slowed for a new national law.

  • Last month, a top lawmaker on the Senate Commerce Committee backed away from a bipartisan panel that was seen as one serious effort to negotiate a privacy bill with broad support.

The bottom line: The approved settlement may be record-setting, but it looks less imposing in the context of Facebook's revenue, which was $15 billion for the most recently reported quarter. Any teeth in the accord are more likely to lie in restrictions placed on Facebook's behavior — and whether the deal lights a fire under lawmakers working on the privacy issue.

Go deeper: Our guide to reading a settlement when it's finalized and released

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.axios.com/ftcs-facebook-fine-draws-fire-5a3e3171-8138-4973-8701-b227791834d7.html

2019-07-13 10:30:00Z
52780331490249

Facebook's $5B FTC fine was so laughable its stock price went UP after the announcement - Boing Boing

In 2011, the US Federal Trade Commission put Facebook under consent decree after the company "deceived consumers by telling them they could keep their information on Facebook private, and then repeatedly [allowed] it to be shared and made public."

The way the FTC generally works is that if it catches a company doing something terrible, it issues one of these "consent decrees" which amount to, "don't do it again, or we'll take the company away."

But Facebook did it again. Hard. And rather than shutting Facebook down, the FTC fined them $5B, which may sound like a lot, it's only about 30% of the revenue from a single quarter and less than a quarter of the company's annual profits. It's basically a license fee for criminality, a tax on lawbreaking that allows the company to retain the vast majority of its profits from criminal activities.

And the street knows it. After the FTC announced the fine, Facebook's share price went up.

And as Peter Kafka notes, regulatory compliance costs aren’t exactly a deterrent either: Facebook will pay the fine, eat the cost of a few more lawyers and PR people to ensure compliance with this new order, and carry on with the business of, uh, issuing a new worldwide currency while exposing underpaid contractors to horrifying videos of people being murdered for $15 an hour.

Facebook’s $5 billion FTC fine is an embarrassing joke [Nilay Patel/The Verge]

(Image: Jason McELweenie, CC-BY, modified) ,

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://boingboing.net/2019/07/12/stay-of-execution.html

2019-07-13 04:09:00Z
52780331490249