Kamis, 27 Juni 2019

Huawei says it doesn't cooperate with Chinese military — after report says its employees did - CNBC

A woman cycles past a Huawei store in Shenyang, China.

Stringer | Reuters

Huawei does not have any company-sanctioned projects cooperating with China's military and does not customize products for use by the country's armed forces, the tech giant's legal chief told CNBC on Thursday.

That comes after Bloomberg reported earlier in the day that, based on public documents, Huawei's workers had cooperated with various parts of China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) on research including on artificial intelligence and radio communications.

But the company exec denied there'd been any official work with the PLA.

"As far as I know, we don't have military cooperation projects because we are a company dedicated to provide communications systems and (information and communications technology) solutions for civil use," Song Liuping, chief legal officer at Huawei, told CNBC in a Thursday interview conducted in Mandarin and translated by a company-provided translator.

"My understanding is we don't have any projects that relate to the military cooperation category. Neither do we customize products or solutions for the military," he added.

Bloomberg's report outlined at least 10 initiatives in the last decade on which Huawei employees allegedly worked with Chinese military units. Those included one to extract and classify emotions in online video comments, according to the report. The information was gathered by looking at publicly available research papers whose authors were identified as Huawei employees, the report said.

A spokesperson for Huawei told CNBC the company is "not aware of its employees publishing research papers in their individual capacity."

Huawei's founder Ren Zhengfei was a former officer in the PLA. Huawei's critics have pointed to that fact to suggest the company has a close relationship with China's military and government. The U.S. government is worried that Huawei's equipment could present a risk of China accessing user data. Washington has also suggested there's hazard associated with laws in China that apparently compel Chinese companies to help Beijing in any national intelligence work if asked.

Ren told CNBC earlier this year that the company would resist any request from Beijing for user data.

"Even if we were ordered to, Huawei would still not install backdoors. If a single backdoor was found in even one of the countries where we operate, our sales would shrink in all of them," Ren said.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/27/huawei-denies-collaboration-with-chinese-military.html

2019-06-27 03:44:59Z
CAIiEEzq90OI82cMxxXbQPbC4sUqGQgEKhAIACoHCAow2Nb3CjDivdcCMP3ungY

Huawei says it doesn't cooperate with Chinese military — after report says its employees did - CNBC

A woman cycles past a Huawei store in Shenyang, China.

Stringer | Reuters

Huawei does not have any company-sanctioned projects cooperating with China's military and does not customize products for use by the country's armed forces, the tech giant's legal chief told CNBC on Thursday.

That comes after Bloomberg reported earlier in the day that, based on public documents, Huawei's workers had cooperated with various parts of China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) on research including on artificial intelligence and radio communications.

But the company exec denied there'd been any official work with the PLA.

"As far as I know, we don't have military cooperation projects because we are a company dedicated to provide communications systems and (information and communications technology) solutions for civil use," Song Liuping, chief legal officer at Huawei, told CNBC in a Thursday interview conducted in Mandarin and translated by a company-provided translator.

"My understanding is we don't have any projects that relate to the military cooperation category. Neither do we customize products or solutions for the military," he added.

Bloomberg's report outlined at least 10 initiatives in the last decade on which Huawei employees allegedly worked with Chinese military units. Those included one to extract and classify emotions in online video comments, according to the report. The information was gathered by looking at publicly available research papers whose authors were identified as Huawei employees, the report said.

A spokesperson for Huawei told CNBC the company is "not aware of its employees publishing research papers in their individual capacity."

Huawei's founder Ren Zhengfei was a former officer in the PLA. Huawei's critics have pointed to that fact to suggest the company has a close relationship with China's military and government. The U.S. government is worried that Huawei's equipment could present a risk of China accessing user data. Washington has also suggested there's hazard associated with laws in China that apparently compel Chinese companies to help Beijing in any national intelligence work if asked.

Ren told CNBC earlier this year that the company would resist any request from Beijing for user data.

"Even if we were ordered to, Huawei would still not install backdoors. If a single backdoor was found in even one of the countries where we operate, our sales would shrink in all of them," Ren said.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/27/huawei-denies-collaboration-with-chinese-military.html

2019-06-27 03:13:50Z
CAIiEEzq90OI82cMxxXbQPbC4sUqGQgEKhAIACoHCAow2Nb3CjDivdcCMP3ungY

Rabu, 26 Juni 2019

A Fed letdown on rate cuts could be the stock market's biggest threat now - CNBC

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell holds a news conference following the two-day Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) policy meeting in Washington, U.S., March 20, 2019.

Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

Despite a policy pivot earlier this year and an even clearer shift just last week, the Federal Reserve remains miles apart from what Wall Street wants.

Central bank officials have indicated that a rate cut is at least on the table, but the market is demanding more — so much more, in fact, that a conflict between the current designated path of monetary policy and the amount of support that investors feel is necessary seems on a collision course.

"We're heading for a reckoning," said Danielle DiMartino Booth, CEO of Quill Intelligence and advisor to then-Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher. "This is where policy errors begin to happen, when the Fed cannot acknowledge they're actually damaging the economy."

Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, through his statements since the June 18-19 Federal Open Market Committee meeting, and his fellow central bankers via the "dot plot" of their rate expectations, at least has nodded that one rate cut could be coming if conditions continue to weaken.

In a public forum Tuesday, Powell noted that conditions have changed since an FOMC meeting in early May, and policy may have to change as well. Powell had said in May that it was unlikely the Fed would change rates.

"The risks to that outlook have increased," he said at the Council on Foreign Relations. "We're very mindful of those risks and are prepared to use our policy tools to support activity as needed."

But the market is pricing in a much more aggressive policy approach.

Stock market could drop 7%-10%

Futures trading points to four cuts over the next year, starting with the July meeting. That's a 100 basis point move in the overnight funds rate from the already low target range of 2.25% to 2.5%.

Should the Fed not move from the current stance, a full percentage point disappointment relative to market expectations would result in tightened financial conditions that could cost the stock market a 7% drop, according to Goldman Sachs estimates that also see a 0.8 percentage point increase in long-term bond yields, a 0.4 percentage point move higher in credit spreads and a 2% rise in the dollar. (Morgan Stanley analyst Michael Wilson thinks the stock market damage could exceed 10%.)

Since the financial crisis when the days of extreme Fed accommodation began, the two sides have been mostly on the same page. There were a few instances of divergence, such as 2013's "taper tantrum" and former Chair Janet Yellen's first news conference, when markets worried that the Fed was going to tighten policy more aggressively than expected. But other than that, market expectations and Fed actions have mostly managed to find common ground.

Powell's comment in October that "we're a long way from neutral" rattled that dynamic, and a rate hike in December didn't help.

With the market now demanding a Fed cut, anything but acquiescence could be trouble.

"Some of the more rational people on the Fed are saying we've got to keep all of our options open to us even if it means disturbing the markets," Booth said. "Therein lies the ultimate conundrum. If you disappoint market expectations at this point, given what CFOs and CEOs [are saying] and given we are headed toward a third straight quarter of negative earnings growth, then you're in the soup."

Inflation expectations waning

In addition to the fed funds markets pricing, markets are speaking loudly in a number of other ways.

Inflation expectations, which are key to Fed decision-making, have tumbled lately. The 5-year break-even rate, which measures Treasury Inflation Protected Securities against Treasurys of the same duration, fell June 17 to 1.45%, the lowest level since Oct. 4, 2016. The breakeven rate Tuesday was at 1.52%. The most recent high was 1.88% in mid-March and was at 2.15% in May 2018.

An Atlanta Fed measure of the consumer price index that features "sticky" prices that don't move much, was at 2.4% in May, though the flexible index of prices that move more freely was at just 0.5% after falling 2.6% from April. CPI overall is at 1.8%; the Fed's preferred measure, the personal consumption expenditures deflator, shows inflation at just 1.5%.

Manufacturing gauges are teetering near contraction territory and readings from individual Fed districts have been universally weaker.

Powell, though, stressed that Fed won't wed itself to near-term data when meeting its mandates of full employment and price stability.

"We're trying to set our policies so that in the medium term it is well-set to achieve those objectives," he said Tuesday. "We're not in the business of really trying to work with short-term movements in financial conditions. We have to look through that [and] look to the underlying economy for firm guidance."

'You have to wait it out'

Markets, then, might have to exercise patience, even though that's not always a common commodity on Wall Street.

"Sometimes you have to wait it out," said Quincy Krosby, chief market strategist at Prudential Financial. "I don't believe they're going to acquiesce unless they believe the economy — forget the market — needs this."

This weekend's G-20 summit, and hoped-for meeting between President Donald Trump and China President Xi Jinping, could provide the kind of news that reverses the "soft" data in business surveys and removes fear over trade.

Should the economy overcome that obstacle, the markets likely would follow and reverse course on the aggressive pricing of rate cuts.

"If the economic data pick up, you're going to see the market become a bit more cyclical," Krosby said. "This is an important period for all of the issues the market is focused on and worried about."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/26/a-federal-reserve-letdown-on-interest-rate-poses-stock-market-threat.html

2019-06-26 15:46:40Z
52780320940204

Trump rips Fed Chair Powell: We should have ECB's Draghi instead - Fox Business

President Trump on Wednesday said the U.S. would be better off if European Central Bank President Mario Draghi led the Federal Reserve, instead of its current chairman, Jerome Powell.

Continue Reading Below

“European nations were set up in order to take advantage of the United States. It was set up for trade in order to take advantage, and they have. You know, they very smartly have.  And they have Draghi who is – we should have Draghi instead of our Fed person,” Trump said in response to whether he is working on a deal with Europe, during an exclusive interview with FOX Business’ Maria Bartiromo.

MORE FROM FOXBUSINESS.COM... 

Trump praised Europe’s efforts to stimulate the economy by lowering interest rates and purchasing financial assets.

“What Europe did with Draghi is they’re forcing money in, we’re doing the opposite. We’re taking money out and we’re raising interest rates – it’s insane,” he said.

“[Powell] should have never raised the rates to the extent that he did," Trump added. "If he would have raised them half – just half – and if he would have not done the quantitative tightening, our market would have been up another 10,000 points. And I’ll tell you, GDP would have been up another point or two points. We could have hit – we potentially could have hit 5 [percent]."

CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE FULL INTERVIEW WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP

Powell warned in a speech on Tuesday that “short-term political pressure” can damage the central bank’s independence.

“Congress chose to insulate the Fed this way because it had seen the damage that often arises when policy bends to short-term political interests,” Powell said during a speech at the Council on Foreign Relations. “Central banks in major democracies around the world have similar independence.”

Trump in a Tweet on Monday echoed his frustration with the Fed and Powell, whom he has reportedly considered firing. However, Trump said on Wednesday, “I never suggested I was going to do that. I do have the right to do it.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX BUSINESS APP

Trump’s comments also come on the heels of accusing Draghi of currency manipulation.

“Mario Draghi just announced more stimulus could come, which immediately dropped the Euro against the Dollar, making it unfairly easier for them to compete against the USA,” Trump wrote in a tweet. “They have been getting away with this for years, along with China and others.”

FOX Business’ Megan Henney contributed to this article.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/trump-rips-fed-chair-powell-we-should-have-ecbs-draghi-instead

2019-06-26 15:41:20Z
52780320940204

FedEx CEO says trade war surprised him like a 'Mike Tyson' punch in the face - Yahoo Finance

Mike Tyson (R) punches Andrew Golota during their match in Auburn Hills, October 20, 2000. (Reuters)

FedEx’s (FDX) top executive assailed current U.S. trade policy as more protectionist measures threaten to upend the courier company’s business plans and take a bite out of its bottom line.

“It reminds me a bit about that old adage of Mike Tyson that everybody has got a plan until they get hit in the mouth,” FedEx CEO Fred Smith said. “So clearly, we’ve been very disappointed over the last few years with the assumptions that we made on the growth in international trade, particularly with the Trump administration.”

Smith made his remarks during a call with investors Tuesday in response to Barclays analyst Brandon Oglenski’s inquiry into FedEx’s growth strategy, especially relating to the company’s Express international air shipping business.

FedEx Express’ operating income came under pressure in the fourth quarter, and the company declined to project fiscal 2020 earnings results for the segment. FedEx said trade disputes and low global growth rates created “significant uncertainty” for the business unit.

“The United States policy since 1934 with Roosevelt and Secretary of State Cordell Hull was to expand international trade,” Smith said. “And now we have a huge dispute where the United States is basically become protectionist defined as, ‘I’ll make everything I need in my own borders. I don't need to import things and quite frankly don't particularly need to export them.’”

Smith also acknowledged what he considered to be flaws with other countries’ trade policies as well, which have further confounded global trade flows.

“We don’t agree with the Chinese position on trade either – and have been very vocal about that – which is mercantilist,” he added.

In its fourth-quarter earnings release Tuesday, FedEx reported that its results for the current fiscal year would be negatively impacted by “weakness in global trade and industrial production.” The company guided toward a mid-single-digit percentage point decline in fiscal 2020 diluted earnings per share, after adjusting for certain retirement plans and integration expenses related to its acquisition of TNT Express.

For the fiscal fourth quarter, FedEx reported better-than-expected results on the top and bottom lines, delivering adjusted earnings per share of $5.01 on revenue of $17.8 billion.

‘Virtually impossible task’

FedEx has also taken issue with other dealings in U.S. trade policy.

The Memphis, Tennessee-based company earlier this week filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Commerce Department requesting that the government “be permanently enjoined from enforcing the export administration regulations against FedEx in circumstances when the company has no knowledge that the contents of the shipment are subject to the [Export Administration Regulations],” FedEx’s general counsel said.

In a court filing, FedEx said that the export restriction rules “essentially deputize FedEx to police the contents of the millions of packages it ships daily even though doing so is a virtually impossible task, logistically, economically, and in many cases, legally.” FedEx argues that it should not be liable in the event that it accidentally ships products violating the Trump administrations’ restrictions.

FedEx is suing the US Department of Commerce for requiring the shipping company to implement extra screening efforts to enforce export bans. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

The lawsuit, which does not specifically name Chinese telecommunications company Huawei in its court filing, took place after the U.S. government in May added Huawei to a list of entities barred from receiving U.S. technology without a license from the Commerce Department. Shortly thereafter, Huawei complained that FedEx had delivered several of its packages to incorrect addresses, sparking an investigation into FedEx by China.

On Tuesday, FedEx CEO Smith disputed claims that the incidences with Huawei were the primary motivation for the decision to file the lawsuit.

“The Huawei packages were only peripherally involved in this lawsuit that we filed,” he said. “And in fact, it goes back many, many years, which is in the lawsuit itself and it concerns not contraband, which many people have confused the lawsuit as concerning. It concerns import and export controls as administered by the Department of Commerce.”

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross disagreed with FedEx’s position in an interview with Fox News Tuesday, saying, “The regulation states that common carriers cannot knowingly ship items in contravention of the entity list or other export control authorities. It does not require a common carrier to be a policeman or to know what’s in every package.”

Smith noted that five new companies were added to the Commerce Department’s Entity List of companies last Friday “with extraordinarily opaque requirements” around export regulation. Smith said fines for violations currently total $250,000 per package.

Emily McCormick is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Twitter: @emily_mcck

Read more from Emily:

Follow Yahoo Finance on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Flipboard, LinkedIn, and reddit.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fed-ex-ceo-trade-war-like-mike-tyson-punch-in-face-134512570.html

2019-06-26 13:45:00Z
52780318695974

Trump says Google, Facebook should be sued over bias allegations | TheHill - The Hill

President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump campaign buys full page ads in Miami newspapers ahead of Dem debates Trump administration's 'forced diplomacy' with Iran isn't working Roy Moore trails Republican field in Alabama MORE on Wednesday said tech giants Google and Facebook should be sued over alleged bias toward conservatives.

“We should be suing Google and Facebook and all that, which perhaps we will,” Trump said during a phone interview with Fox Business Network.

Trump also attacked Twitter, claiming without evidence that the company is “making it very hard” to “get out my message” by making it more difficult for people to follow him.

“Twitter is just terrible, what they do,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

The president reportedly complained about his follower count during an April meeting with Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, who explained his lost followers were largely bots.

Republicans have long accused Google and Facebook of suppressing conservative content and ads, something they say violates free speech protections. Others say the sites are private companies that are not bound by the First Amendment and have the ability to regulate the content that appears on their platforms.

Some GOP lawmakers have suggested that Congress should remove protections under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act in order to hold web platforms legally liable for content posted by users.

“These people are all Democrats. It’s totally biased towards Democrats,” Trump said, citing anti-Trump comments made by one Google employee published by a website run by conservative activist James O’Keefe.

The employee, Jen Gennai, said the video was recorded by people who lied about their identities, filmed her without her consent and “selectively edited” the footage.

Executives from the tech companies have long denied institutional bias at their companies, and Democrats have repeatedly said there is no evidence to back up conservatives’ claims there is widespread bias at companies like Google, Facebook and Twitter.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/450388-trump-says-google-facebook-should-be-sued-over-bias-allegations

2019-06-26 13:07:12Z
CBMicmh0dHBzOi8vdGhlaGlsbC5jb20vaG9tZW5ld3MvYWRtaW5pc3RyYXRpb24vNDUwMzg4LXRydW1wLXNheXMtZ29vZ2xlLWZhY2Vib29rLXNob3VsZC1iZS1zdWVkLW92ZXItYmlhcy1hbGxlZ2F0aW9uc9IBdmh0dHBzOi8vdGhlaGlsbC5jb20vaG9tZW5ld3MvYWRtaW5pc3RyYXRpb24vNDUwMzg4LXRydW1wLXNheXMtZ29vZ2xlLWZhY2Vib29rLXNob3VsZC1iZS1zdWVkLW92ZXItYmlhcy1hbGxlZ2F0aW9ucz9hbXA

Jerome Powell is facing a predicament ahead of July's Fed meeting - Axios

Fed Chair Jerome Powell at the Council on Foreign Relations
Jerome Powell at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York City. Photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Fed Chair Jerome Powell has been put in a tough situation by President Trump and the market ahead of July's FOMC meeting, with his hand forced in the face of historic uncertainty — but he hasn't done much to help himself.

Why it matters ... The U.S. economy is at a delicate moment: trade and manufacturing data are worsening, jobs growth is volatile and slowing, and the bond market is bracing for the worst while equity investors keep expecting the best.

Driving the news: Powell again sought safety in equivocation on Tuesday, noting during a speech at the Council of Foreign Relations that "the global risk picture has changed ... since May 1, significantly," but also saying "it’s important not to overreact in the short term to things that happen to be temporary or transient."

Be smart: The Fed chair has responded by embracing what Axios' Felix Salmon calls "constructive ambiguity," pushing back against the blueprint created by predecessors Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen. They dictated the Fed's plans to the market with forward guidance and long-winded policy statements. Powell has reversed course.

  • "Rate guidance as a tool is about the Fed being in front of markets and leading them to where [the Fed] wants to go," Vincent Reinhart, a 24-year Fed veteran who now serves as chief economist at Standish Mellon Asset Management, tells Axios.
  • "December's [FOMC meeting] showed that if you're leading, you are the target of criticism, both from the markets and the president, so they switched to much more data dependence ... and moved from the front of the pack to the back."

The bottom line: Powell is not just fighting Trump's continued criticism, as Axios' Courtenay Brown writes, but also his trade war's negative impact on the U.S. economy, while also having to hedge against a surprise agreement.

  • An "insurance rate cut" in July could not only prove a policy mistake, but further erode Powell's credibility and the Fed's.
  • But not cutting rates will put him in the crosshairs of the president and the market, which has investors pricing in a 0% chance he doesn't do it.

Go deeper: Powell's Fed statements aren't dumbing things down

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.axios.com/jerome-powell-federal-reserve-trump-administration-fe806cb5-68cc-4567-8b65-2bb02f5aec7d.html

2019-06-26 12:02:00Z
52780320940204