Sabtu, 22 Juni 2019

Electric Car Major Headache: Waiting Hours for Charging Bay then Hrs to Charge - MishTalk

The electric vehicle grand vision may flounder on something most drivers take for granted: a quick pit stop.

The inconvenient truth of electric vehicles is they are terribly inconvenient to own and operate. Most cars need a charge after 200 to 250 miles traveled.

Charging them requires finding a charging station, and then an open bay.

The New York Times reports L.A. to Vegas and Back by Electric Car: 8 Hours Driving; 5 More Plugged In.

The NYT author, Ivan Penn, drove a Chevrolet Bolt from LA to Las Vegas, a 540-mile round trip that many people make regularly.

Penn reports that in addition to eight hours on the road, he spent close to five and a half hours charging the car. That's about 41% charging time.

It could have been much worse. "We always found a charger available, though more than once we got the last one, and drivers arriving after us had to wait," said Penn.

Thus, what was 5.5 hours could easily have been 8 hours. All it would have taken was one nasty wait. Tesla owners have been known to wait an hour or more for a charger to open up. And Tesla owners can use either Tesla stations or public stations. The reverse is not true.

The United States has about 24,000 public charging stations, with an average of fewer than three charging posts. By comparison, there are about 150,000 gas stations, some with dozens of pumps.

Will the number of charging stations increase as fast as electric vehicles?

I don't know but the alleged saving over gasoline is not as good as reported.

Charging costs an average cost $10 for about 200 miles, depending on the car, That's about about half the typical cost of gasoline for that distance, according to AAA.

"Our experience was not as economical: We spent about $67 on electricity, perhaps $10 less than we might have on gas," says Penn. Of course, no one can predict with any reasonable degree of accuracy, future electric costs or future gasoline prices.

Is this really "green"?

Debates on environmental friendliness rage, but even if this is an environmentally friendly setup, it's ridiculously inconvenient to spend 8 hours or even 5.5 hours charging a car for an 8-hour trip.

Regulations

There are no standards for plugs, fast chargers, or number of bays. Regulations have not caught up, but Mountlake Terrace, Washington, a Seattle suburb, is forcing developers to put up charging stations.

  1. Signage. Each charging station space shall be posted with signage indicating the space is only for electric vehicle charging purposes. Days and hours of operation shall be included if time limits or tow-away provisions are to be enforced.
  2. Clearance. Charging station equipment mounted on pedestals, light posts, bollards or other devices shall be a minimum of 24 inches clear from the face of curb.
  3. Charging Station Equipment. Charging station outlets and connector devices shall be no less than 36 inches or no higher than 48 inches from the top of surface where mounted, and shall contain a retraction device and/or a place to hang permanent cords and connectors sufficiently above the ground or paved surface.
  4. Charging Station Equipment Protection. When the electric vehicle charging station space is perpendicular or at an angle to curb face and charging equipment, adequate equipment protection, such as wheel stops or concrete-filled steel bollards shall be used.
  5. Maintenance. Charging station equipment shall be maintained in all respects, including the functioning of the charging equipment. A phone number or other contact information shall be provided on the charging station equipment for reporting when the equipment is not functioning or other problems are encountered.

Required Number of Stations

When Do EV Vehicles Make Sense?

  1. Currently, nowhere, from a cost standpoint. People buy EVs or hybrids on the questionable belief they are doing something for the environment.
  2. For those who very seldom drive at all and for those whom walking, public transportation, or Uber is a viable option, no car of any kind makes economic sense. However, for those who demand the convenience of having a car, the points made below apply.
  3. If and when the cost of an EV is no more than the cost of a gas-powered vehicle (factoring in gas, insurance, life of car, maintenance costs) EVs become practical for those who seldom if ever drive more than 150 mile or so before a known lengthy stop that also happens to have a charger. For most, the charging station needs to be home or work.
  4. Until batteries charge as fast or nearly as fast fueling a gas-powered vehicle or readily available battery swapping stations exist, EVs will not make sense for a big percentage of drivers.

Number 3 may happen soon, or not, but 3 likely precedes 4 by a lengthy period.

Those who live in a big metropolitan area who seldom is ever drive outside that area, who also demand the convenience of having their own car whether it makes economic sense might find EVs practical in the near future. Many millions of people meet this description.

In general, ownership and inconvenience costs need to drop before EV ownership takes off. For many, we are a decade away unless and until there are readily available super-fast charging or swapping stations.

For those living in cities, I expect outright ownership rates will drop as self-driving Uber and new rental opportunities catch on.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://moneymaven.io/mishtalk/economics/electric-car-major-headache-waiting-hours-for-charging-bay-then-hrs-to-charge-NidkyH-xY0alvIoaQibQJw/

2019-06-22 20:04:00Z
52780319365496

Electric airplanes take flight at the Paris Air Show - Quartz

First came propellers. Then jet engines. Now the electric motor is starting to reshape aircraft.

The world’s largest aerospace event, the Paris Air Show, was held this week. By the numbers, the electric airplanes on display were a sideshow. More than 400 fossil fuel-powered aircraft worth $15 billion were sold as airlines stocked up to serve the world’s burgeoning demand for air travel.

But it was Cape Air’s order of the first commercial electric airplanes that drew particular attention. The Israeli startup Eviation Aircraft took a “double-digit” number of orders for a $4 million electric plane dubbed Alice. The aircraft can fly 650 miles (1,046 km) at around 500 miles per hour (805 km/h) with three electric motors on the tail and one on each wingtip. The prototype carries a 900 kWh lithium-ion battery (about nine times bigger than Tesla’s largest automotive battery).

Extending 40 ft (12 m), the plane carries just nine passengers, but that’s fine for Cape Air, a regional airline in the state of Massachusetts that completes hundreds of short flights each day. Its 92 planes serve about half a million passengers annually, making it one of the largest regional airlines in the US.

Cape Air’s short hops make it a perfect match for electric flight. Batteries can’t yet store as much energy as liquid fuel, making them unsuitable for long-haul flights where they’d add too much weight. But for flights under a few hundreds miles (the distance will grow as batteries improve), electric propulsion is much cheaper: 10 times less expensive for fuel alone, says electric motor maker MagniX. With lower maintenance, faster turnaround, and more durable systems, electric aircraft can save millions of dollars for short-haul airlines each year.

But large jet aircraft makers aren’t waiting for the electric revolution. Hybrid technology, in which electric-assist kicks in throughout the flight, will be ready in the next few years. Boeing and JetBlue have invested in Zunum Aero to roll out a hybrid craft later this year. Right behind is the merged United Technologies-Raytheon releasing a hybrid retrofit of its regional turboprop, and Airbus’s entry is due out in 2022. Meanwhile the number of electric aircraft under development keeps growing. Consultancy Roland Berger expects the number to jump from 170 to 200 by year’s end.

If the economics isn’t enough, the climate crisis is. The aviation industry contributes 2% to 3% of global emissions, and countries can’t reach their climate goals without addressing that. Sweden and Norway say they plan to make all short flights electric by 2040. Scotland, the Netherlands, California, and the UK have all begun putting financial incentives in place to reduce aviation emissions. Customers are ahead of them: Investment bank UBS  reports 22% of people it surveyed in the US and Germany were already cutting back on air travel for environmental reasons. For those under 44, it exceeded 50%.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://qz.com/1650449/electric-airplanes-take-flight-at-the-paris-air-show/?utm_source=google-news

2019-06-22 17:53:00Z
CAIiEDqyouLR3BWPIz1pW9B__U4qGAgEKg8IACoHCAowi4-MATDXsRUwxImYBg

Electric Planes, Flying Taxis, Supersonic Jets: Paris Air Show Gives Us a Peek at the Future of Flight - Fortune

Welcome! To bring you the best content on our sites and applications, Meredith partners with third party advertisers to serve digital ads, including personalized digital ads. Those advertisers use tracking technologies to collect information about your activity on our sites and applications and across the Internet and your other apps and devices.

You always have the choice to experience our sites without personalized advertising based on your web browsing activity by visiting the DAA’s Consumer Choice page, the NAI's website, and/or the EU online choices page, from each of your browsers or devices. To avoid personalized advertising based on your mobile app activity, you can install the DAA’s AppChoices app here. You can find much more information about your privacy choices in our privacy policy. 

Even if you choose not to have your activity tracked by third parties for advertising services, you will still see non-personalized ads on our site.

By clicking continue below and using our sites or applications, you agree that we and our third party advertisers can:

  • transfer your personal data to the United States or other countries, and
  • process your personal data to serve you with personalized ads, subject to your choices as described above and in our privacy policy.

EU Data Subject Requests

Let's block ads! (Why?)


http://fortune.com/2019/06/22/2019-paris-air-show-tech/

2019-06-22 16:38:00Z
CBMiN2h0dHA6Ly9mb3J0dW5lLmNvbS8yMDE5LzA2LzIyLzIwMTktcGFyaXMtYWlyLXNob3ctdGVjaC_SAUJodHRwOi8vYW1wLnRpbWVpbmMubmV0L2ZvcnR1bmUvMjAxOS8wNi8yMi8yMDE5LXBhcmlzLWFpci1zaG93LXRlY2g

Bottled water sold at Whole Foods, Target found with high levels of arsenic, study says - Fox Business

A study by the Center for Environmental Health found that high levels of arsenic were found in Starkey Water and Penafiel.  (iStock)

Testing found that high levels of arsenic were found in two bottled water brands sold at Target and Whole Foods, a study stated.

Continue Reading Below

The testing, commissioned by the Center for Environmental Health (CEH), found the high levels of arsenic in Starkey Water, which is owned by Whole Foods, and Penafiel, which is owned by Keurig Dr Pepper and sold at Target stores.

“CEH has sent legal notices to these bottled water manufacturers and retailers because the amount of arsenic in the water is above the level requiring a health warning under California’s consumer protection law Proposition 65,” a press release from the CEH stated. “Prop 65 identifies arsenic as a metal that causes reproductive harm and cancer.”

MORE FROM FOXBUSINESS.COM

The press release stated children could be the most harmed by high levels of arsenic because to their bodies are still developing. The element could also harm an unborn child.

“Consumers are being needlessly exposed to arsenic without their knowledge or consent,” Michael Green, the CEO of CEH, said in a statement. “Customers typically purchase bottled water at exorbitantly high costs with the assumption that it is safer and healthier to drink than tap water, unaware that they are ingesting an extremely toxic metal linked to birth defects and cancer.”

The report stated the findings confirm research conducted by Consumer Reports earlier this year, “which also discovered high levels of arsenic in these bottled water brands.”

On Friday, Keurig Dr Pepper announced it will be withdrawing Penafiel products from shelves due to “presence of violative levels of arsenic,” a press release from the Food and Drug Administration stated. The products are sold at Target, Walmart and other vendors, according to USA Today. Consumers can return the products to a retailer for a full refund.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX BUSINESS APP

A Whole Foods Market spokesperson told FOX Business in a statement, "At Starkey Water, our highest priority is to provide customers with safe, high-quality and refreshing spring water. Beyond the required annual testing by an FDA certified lab, we have an accredited third-party lab test every production run of water before it is sold, and our test results from the same lot analyzed by Consumer Reports show that these products are fully compliant with FDA standards for heavy metals. We would never sell products that do not meet FDA requirements.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxbusiness.com/features/bottled-water-sold-at-whole-foods-target-found-with-high-levels-of-arsenic-study-says

2019-06-22 12:32:03Z
CBMiemh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZveGJ1c2luZXNzLmNvbS9mZWF0dXJlcy9ib3R0bGVkLXdhdGVyLXNvbGQtYXQtd2hvbGUtZm9vZHMtdGFyZ2V0LWZvdW5kLXdpdGgtaGlnaC1sZXZlbHMtb2YtYXJzZW5pYy1zdHVkeS1zYXlz0gF-aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZm94YnVzaW5lc3MuY29tL2ZlYXR1cmVzL2JvdHRsZWQtd2F0ZXItc29sZC1hdC13aG9sZS1mb29kcy10YXJnZXQtZm91bmQtd2l0aC1oaWdoLWxldmVscy1vZi1hcnNlbmljLXN0dWR5LXNheXMuYW1w

Is Toys R Us making a comeback? A year after stores closed, there's talk of new locations - USA TODAY

Toys R Us is poised to make a comeback under a new name and with a much smaller footprint.

Almost exactly a year after the remaining Toys R Us stores closed in late June 2018, Bloomberg is reporting that a new e-commerce site and half dozen stores could open later ahead of holiday shopping.

Richard Barry, who previously served as global chief merchandising officer for Toys R Us and is president and CEO of the new Tru Kids Inc., has been pitching his vision to toymakers to revive the chain, Bloomberg reported citing people familiar with the plans.

The new vision includes smaller stores about 10,000 square feet that will reportedly offer more experiences, like play areas. Many of the Toys R Us stores that closed last year were around 30,000 square feet.

Store closings 2019: CVS, Payless and Victoria's Secret are just some of the brands closing stores

Life after Babies R Us: Walmart and Target expand baby options and toys

In February, the new company announced in a statement that it started doing business on Jan. 20 as Tru Kids Brands and was the "proud parent of Toys"R"Us, Babies"R"Us, Geoffrey and more than 20 established consumer toy and baby brands."

On June 5, the new company announced it was returning to Australia and making its debut in New Zealand.

Digital update: Mattel revs up Hot Wheels to new digital generation

Tru Kids will be based in New Jersey, and its workforce includes a team of former Toys R Us employees.

"We have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to write the next chapter of Toys R Us by launching a newly imagined omni-channel retail experience for our beloved brands here in the U.S.," Barry said in February's statement announcing the plans.

A Tru Kids spokeswoman told Bloomberg that it wasn’t ready to publicly share details on its U.S. strategy.

Contributing: Melanie Anzidei, North Jersey Record

Follow USA TODAY reporter Kelly Tyko on Twitter: @KellyTyko

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/06/21/toys-r-us-comeback-tru-kids-new-stores/1533632001/

2019-06-22 06:09:00Z
52780318732635