Kamis, 06 Juni 2019

Why Europe needs to monitor China's rare earths threat - CNBC

Workers transport soil containing rare earth elements for export at a port in Lianyungang, Jiangsu province, China October 31, 2010.

Stringer | Reuters

European manufacturers will need to keep an eye on China's "near-monopoly" on the extraction and supply of rare earth minerals as they move toward electric power, experts have told CNBC.

Rare earths — minerals found in a wide range of everyday consumer electronics — hit the headlines over the past week as China hinted at stopping the export of rare earths to the U.S., after Washington increased tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods.

The group of 17 minerals aren't actually rare, but are produced in fairly scarce quantities compared with abundantly mined metals like copper. They have grown in prominence in recent years due to their use in high-tech equipment, defense manufacturing and electric vehicles.

China extracted 70% of the world's rare earths in 2018.

Martin Eales, CEO of London-listed Rainbow Rare Earths, which runs an ongoing mining project in Burundi, told CNBC that China may not opt for an outright export ban but rather a reduction in its production quota, which "by definition would reduce the amount of rare earths material available for export and potentially create supply problems for rest-of-the-world users."

The automotive revolution

The long-term concern for European manufacturers, however, will be the increased volume of rare earths required, according to the British Geological Survey's Science Director for Minerals, Andrew Bloodworth.

As the automotive sector moves from internal combustion engines to electric vehicles, many of those electric motors will rely on high field strength electric magnets which contain rare earth components.

"This isn't going to happen overnight, but as the automotive sector moves from petrol and diesel power to electric, you can make a very efficient small powerful electric motor using high field strength magnets," Bloodworth told CNBC.

"The difference there is just that the volumes required to manufacture the millions and millions of cars every year are going to change the game, because they're going to up that demand for materials."

Vertical integration

Bloodworth suggested that the Chinese are aware of the changing portfolio of materials required by the auto industry, adding that they are "particularly interested in selling the global automotive sector motors or even finished cars rather than rare earths."

"So we may see the market operating in a sense that if this demand does ramp up quickly, prices will rise, therefore some of these projects which are kicking around in the rest of the world will come to pass because they will become more attractive to investors," he said.

At the moment, non-Chinese mines are a difficult proposition for investors owing to the scale of Chinese dominance, but Bloodworth suggested any imposition of tariffs or restrictions would be "nuanced," as it would not be in Chinese interests to hike prices in a way that encourages alternative supply sources to enter the market.

Eales agreed that an added interest for companies like Rainbow, operating non-Chinese mines, is "speculation as to how it may fit into a future supply chain that attempts to bypass China entirely."

"There is going to be so much demand from the vehicle market for rare earths that some of these projects will come to pass anyway," said Bloodworth.

"They may be acquired by Volkswagen or Toyota for instance — they will be buying supply and vertically integrating. "

He suggested that Europe was becoming more concerned about the raw material supply chain, owing to its role as a major producer of finished vehicles and the threat that Chinese monopolization of the supply chain poses.

The British Geological Survey has been communicating to the British government the importance of understanding this shifting tide for global manufacturing.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/06/rare-earths-why-europe-needs-to-monitor-chinas-threat.html

2019-06-06 05:07:44Z
52780309750556

Rabu, 05 Juni 2019

Sephora to give staff diversity training - can it help? - BBC News

Beauty chain Sephora has closed its US stores for Diversity training, a month after a singer said she had been racially profiled.

RnB star SZA said she had been targeted while shopping at a branch in California.

The firm told Reuters it was aware of the incident but said the training was not "a response to any one event".

The BBC spoke to Asad Dhunna from the Unmistakables, who advises companies on how to be more racially inclusive.

Video journalist: Sophie Van Brugen

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/av/business-48513629/sephora-to-give-staff-diversity-training-can-it-help

2019-06-05 14:15:56Z
52780308898032

These charts show how Fed Chair Jerome Powell is the most important thing to the market now - CNBC

The Dow Jones Industrial Average rallied more than 500 points on Tuesday (and was continuing that rally Wednesday) after Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell opened the door to a rate cut that traders have been crying for because of fears the economy is slowing.

Their love of Powell's pivot is evident in this Dow chart here:

"We will act as appropriate to sustain the expansion," was all Powell said, but that was enough to cause the market to leap.

Now contrast that with what happened on May 1, when Powell disappointed investors by appearing to downplay the odds of a rate cut by saying that he believed a slowdown in inflation was likely "transitory."

The Dow shed 150 points during that session.

What a difference a month makes when there's a vicious sell-off in risk assets.

"Powell's assurance the Fed will 'act as appropriate to sustain the expansion' was confirmation that not only is a rate cut on the table, but it is nearing on the horizon," Ian Lyngen, head of U.S. rate strategy at BMO, wrote in an email. "Risk assets improved in the wake of the dovish undertones; at least that aspect of Tuesday's price action fit with our broader understanding of the world."

"A preemptive cut was priced-in, which suggests if the Fed doesn't follow-through it will be risk off," he added.

— CNBC's Jeff Cox contributed reporting.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/05/investors-warm-up-to-fed-policy-outlook-after-powell-hints-at-rate-cut.html

2019-06-05 14:13:09Z
52780307955932

Fed rate cuts could boost the S&P 500 this much, says Barclays - MarketWatch

Stocks may continue to rip higher following Tuesday’s monster rally, triggered by Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell.

Equity futures are pointing to another day of gains Wednesday as investors continue to factor in signs that the Fed chief is open to an interest-rate cut. Of course, some would argue Powell didn’t come right out and promise anything, which raises the question as to whether investors might be getting a little too carried away.

“How much truth there was in the big rally for markets yesterday and how much was dramatized is open for question,” Deutsche Bank strategists Jim Reid, Craig Nicol and Quinn Brody told clients in a note.

Financial markets and investors have been increasingly looking for assurances that the Fed is ready to step in and head off a U.S. recession. Worrying economic data and worsening global trade disputes have led to expectations that the Fed could cut rates up to three times this year. Indeed, the World Bank on Tuesday forecast the slowest global economic growth in three years.

Here’s another question for investors: How much more can the stock market gain from future interest rates cuts? Our chart of the day from Barclays (h/t Die Welt’s Holger Zschaepitz) may have at least one answer.

The chart below lays out how the S&P 500 performed after nine separate interest-rate cuts by the Fed, between 1974 and 2007.

The data shows the index has gained an average 2.8% six months after a Fed cut, but stocks were actually weaker on four occasions. The index gained about 6.7% a year after a rate cut but stocks were lower in three of those rate-cutting years. Still, Barclays analysts said that while complacency may have left the market, that’s no reason to throw caution to the wind.

Opinion: Stock bulls are telling themselves a lot of lies about this market

The market

The Dow DJIA, +0.34% S&P 500 SPX, +0.25% and Nasdaq COMP, +0.28%  are all higher as trading gets underway. Read Market Snapshot for more.

Gold GCQ19, +1.05% is up, but oil CLN19, -1.20% is sagging on ahead of inventory data. The dollar DXY, -0.14%  is down, notably against the New Zealand dollar NZDUSD, +0.6659%  after hawkish comments from the country’s central bank. The yield on the 10-year U.S. bond TMUBMUSD10Y, -1.91%  is down 2.08%.

Read: ‘Buckle up!’ When oil and gold trade like this, it usually spells doom for the market

European stocks SXXP, +0.28% are modestly higher, while Asia mostly tracked Wall Street gains—the Nikkei NIK, +1.80% added 1.8%. Meanwhile, a day after a central-bank rate cut, Australia data showed the slowest growth in a decade.

The economy

ADP employment, or private-sector payrolls hit a nine-year low. The Markit services purchasing managers index and the Institute for Supply Management’s non-manufacturing index are still to come. See our data preview here

Later, we’ll get the Beige Book of economic conditions from the Fed, along with the second day of the central bank’s Chicago conference, featuring a speech from Fed Vice Chair Richard Clarida.

The call

After dropping about 12% so far this year U.S. oil prices are starting to bottom out, but they aren’t there yet, says our call of the day from analysts at Commerzbank.

“The main selling pressure appears to have abated, though not to a sufficient extent as yet for prices to recover noticeably or, more important, lastingly,” Eugen Weinberg and the team told clients.

Oil got a lift Tuesday as investors piled into perceived riskier assets such as stocks and crude, but fell after the American Petroleum Institute reported U.S. crude supplies rose nearly 3.6 million barrels in the latest week. More closely watched data from the Energy Information Administration is due later, and analysts are expecting a drop of 1.7 million barrels.

Commerzbank analysts say signs of more U.S. supply would hurt oil, but add that we shouldn’t be surprised if a fall doesn’t help prices. Given current market sentiment, Commerzbank says any supply drop would need to be “pretty sizable.”

The buzz

In the first face-to-face meeting between high-level trade negotiators since talks stalled last month, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin will reportedly meet with Yi Gang, governor of the People’s Bank of China, at this weekend’s G-20 summit in Japan.

An activist investor has called for an independent investigation into how much power Facebook FB, -0.28%  CEO Mark Zuckerberg has over the social media company.

Shares of GameStop GME, -34.21%  are sliding after the retailer missed revenue forecasts. InflaRx shares are down 84% after the biotech delivered disappointing news on its skincare drug.

Come for the 30-roll pack of toilet paper, stay for the $400,000 diamond rings—at wholesaler Costco COST, +0.12%  

Streaming video group Netflix NFLX, -0.44%  has released season five of its hits series “Black Mirror” to some eager fans.

The quote

“I don’t think anybody reasonable is gonna come to the conclusion that Apple’s a monopoly. Our share is much more modest. We don’t have a dominant position in any market.”—That was Apple CEO Tim Cook, after reports the U.S. government may investigate his and other big tech companies. Speaking to CBS he said out-of-control fake news is the real worry these days.

Read: Developers sue Apple over high costs of App store

And: U.S. could ‘get rolled’ in a trade war due to Big Tech regulation, says Druckenmiller

Random reads

Cruises to Cuba get curtailed by Trump administration

American college graduates upend the empty-nest tradition for their parents

Denmark could be about to elect its youngest-ever prime minister

U.S. Army Rangers scale Normandy cliffs to honor D-Day veterans

Need to Know starts early and is updated until the opening bell, but sign up here to get it delivered once to your email box. Be sure to check the Need to Know item. The emailed version will be sent out at about 7:30 a.m. Eastern.

Follow MarketWatch on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.marketwatch.com/story/fed-rate-cuts-could-boost-the-sp-500-this-much-says-barclays-2019-06-05

2019-06-05 13:31:00Z
52780307955932

Job growth screeches to a near halt in May, with private payrolls up just 27,000 - CNBC

Job creation skidded to a near-halt in May in another sign that the U.S. economic momentum is slowing.

Companies added just 27,000 new positions during the month, according to a report Wednesday from payroll processing firm ADP and Moody's Analytics that was well below Dow Jones estimates of 173,000.

The reading was the worst since around the time the economic expansion began and the jobs market bottomed in March 2010 with a loss of 113,000. Since then, the private payrolls count has increased by 21.3 million.

"Job growth is moderating," Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, said in a statement. "Labor shortages are impeding job growth, particularly at small companies, and layoffs at brick-and-mortar retailers are hurting."

Indeed, the most damage came at companies with fewer than 50 employees, which reported a loss of 52,000 jobs, and in the goods-producing sector, which saw a decline of 43,000. Almost all of the small business loss (50,000) came at firms with fewer than 20 employees, while the big loser in the goods sector was construction, where 36,000 positions were lost.

Large companies withstood the slowdown, adding 68,000 jobs, while those with 50 to 499 employees contributed 11,000.

The anemic May growth comes after a powerful surge in April of 271,000, the highest since July though revised down 4,000 from the initial reading. Private job creation in the ADP/Moody's count has averaged 188,000 a month in 2019.

"Following an overly strong April, May marked the smallest gain since the expansion began," Ahu Yildirmaz, vice president and co-head of the ADP Research Institute, said in a statement. "Large companies continue to remain strong as they are better equipped to compete for labor in a tight labor market."

The disappointing report comes two days before the more closely watched official government reading on nonfarm payrolls. Economists surveyed by Dow Jones expect the Labor Department to report growth of 180,000, down from April's 263,000, and the unemployment report to hold at a 50-year low of 3.6%. The ADP report occasionally can cause economists to revise their expectations for nonfarm payrolls, though the two numbers can differ widely.

Zandi later told CNBC that the May ADP number probably "overstates the case" for a weakening economy and estimated that the nonfarm payrolls report probably would come in around 150,000 based on the average of the past two months' private payrolls numbers.

At a sector level, all the gains came on the services side, which added 71,000 positions. Health care and social assistance grew by 34,000, followed by professional and business services (22,000), and leisure and hospitality (16,000). The "other services" category saw a drop of 9,000, while information lost 3,000 and education decreased by 1,000.

All of the major goods producing categories reported losses, with natural resources and mining down 4,000 and manufacturing off by 3,000. Franchise jobs also fell by 4,800.

The news comes at a sensitive time for the economy.

After a solid 2018 that saw GDP up 2.9% and an unusually strong first-quarter growth rate of 3.1%, economists now expect a slowdown through at least the next two quarters. CNBC's Rapid Update survey forecasts gains of just 1.7% in the second quarter.

Financial markets have slowed considerably after a record-setting pace to start the year. Even with Tuesday's powerful rally, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has fallen 4.4% in the past month.

Markets are betting that the Federal Reserve steps in with at least two and possibly three rate cuts this year. In a speech Tuesday, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said the central bank is prepared to "act as appropriate" to keep the expansion going, which markets took as an encouraging sign that policy easing could be on the way.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/05/job-growth-screeches-to-near-halt-in-mayprivate-payrolls-up-just-27k.html

2019-06-05 12:30:01Z
52780309476562

Gold Prices Up 1% After 27K Job Growth In U.S. ADP Employment Report - Kitco News

(Kitco News) - Gold prices are up 1% on the day and near session highs following significantly weaker growth in private sector employment, according to the latest report from private payrolls company ADP.

Wednesday, ADP said that 27,000 jobs were created in May, missing expectations; consensus forecasts were calling for job growth of 185,000.

Gold prices were in positive territory ahead of the report and have jumped higher in initial reaction. August gold futures last traded at $1,342.10 an ounce, up 1.02% on the day.

According to reports, this is the slowest growth rate in the private sector since March 2010. Small businesses and the manufacturing sector were the hardest hit with jobless in all major sectors.

Along with gold prices pushing to session highs, the U.S. dollar is trading at session lows; the U.S. dollar index last traded at 96.99 points.

Although the ADP data is not a consistent predictor ahead of Friday's report, some economists have said that it does provide some downside risk to the official government numbers. The labor market has been a significant bright spot for the U.S. Economy and the latest employment data could add jitters to a marketplace that is already concerned about rising recession risks, said some economists.

"Even when considering the average absolute difference between this series and private non-farm payrolls on first release, this adds to the downside risk to Friday's report," said Katherine Judge, senior economist at CIBC Capital Markets.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.kitco.com/news/2019-06-05/Gold-Prices-Up-1-After-25K-Job-Growth-In-U-S-ADP-Employment-Report.html

2019-06-05 12:18:00Z
52780309476562

From Amazon To Walmart, 2020 Candidates Take On Big Corporations By Name - NPR

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders speaks during a 2015 rally to push for a raise to the minimum wage to $15 an hour. Andrew Harnik/AP hide caption

toggle caption
Andrew Harnik/AP

Bernie Sanders may not have his usual adoring crowds at his Wednesday campaign stop. That's because he'll be speaking to Walmart shareholders at their annual meeting.

The Vermont senator and 2020 Democratic presidential candidate will present a proposal aimed at giving workers representation on the company's board, echoing a policy he is reportedly working on. (Elizabeth Warren has released a similar policy.)

On Tuesday afternoon, Sanders released a statement criticizing Walmart for issues beyond worker representation on the board.

"It is time for Walmart to pay all of its workers a living wage, give them a seat at the table, stop blocking them from joining a union and allow part-time employees to work full-time jobs," he said.

It's not just Sanders; this is an example of a tactic that has gained traction in the 2020 presidential race, of candidates calling out specific companies in their campaigning and their policies.

Sanders is presenting the resolution on behalf of Cat Davis, a Walmart worker and shareholder, and a leader of the group United for Respect, which aims to protect workers' rights at large corporations.

The proposal would require that the board include hourly associates on its lists of potential new members. Sanders will have three minutes to present the resolution, and it will be put to a vote on Wednesday. The resolution is not expected to pass.

Candidates vs. corporations

Sanders in 2018 already took aim at Walmart with the Stop WALMART Act — "WALMART" here standing for "Welfare for Any Large Monopoly Amassing Revenue from Taxpayers." That bill would have stopped large employers from undertaking stock buybacks unless they take particular steps to boost workers, like paying them at least $15 an hour.

He's introduced another bill with a pointed acronym, the Stop BEZOS Act (That is, "Stop Bad Employers by Zeroing Out Subsidies") — a title aimed at Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos. That bill would tax large employers for the social safety net programs, like food stamps, that their workers use.

Technology firms have also come under scrutiny among candidates, as they are under scrutiny on Capitol Hill. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., in March released a plan to break up big tech companies, with the aim of allowing smaller companies to thrive. In her unveiling, she called out particular companies by name.

"My administration will make big, structural changes to the tech sector to promote more competition — including breaking up Amazon, Facebook, and Google," Warren wrote in a March Medium post. Since then, Sanders and Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard have voiced support for her plan.

In addition, strikes at the grocery store chain Stop and Shop drew support from candidates including Warren, South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg, Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar and former Vice President Joe Biden. Similarly, strikes at McDonald's restaurants have drawn support from multiple candidates.

Rising populism on display

Democratic candidates did take aim at corporations in the 2016 campaign — Bernie Sanders took aim at McDonald's for its wages. Both he and Hillary Clinton did join striking Verizon workers in 2016.

"We were always struggling with, 'How do you make policy tangible?'" said Amanda Renteria, political director for the 2016 Clinton campaign. "And that's a really easy way to do so. People know what Walmart is. People have a conception about it."

But Clinton rarely referenced specific companies negatively on the 2016 campaign trail.

"That really wasn't her style," said Renteria.

It's a tactic that relatively few major candidates have made central to their campaigns in recent years. But the willingness to aggressively call out big companies was arguably long in coming.

"I feel like the political moment we're in is really an outgrowth of really the worker militancy that started in 2012, 2013," said Joseph Geevarghese, executive director of Our Revolution, an advocacy group that grew out of Sanders' 2016 presidential run.

He's talking about walkouts among fast food workers and other low-wage workers that took place in those years (at the time, he was at worker-advocacy group Good Jobs Nation).

Those walkouts themselves had a variety of even older potential causes, he added – long-building inequality; a long, slow recovery from the Great Recession; and the subsequent Occupy Movement, for example.

But whatever the path, the culmination is a political atmosphere where anger is a dominant emotion — and something President Trump has modeled, as well as liberal figures.

"We have been in a populist moment over the last six, seven years," Geevarghese said. "I think Occupy, the strike wave, those are all symbols of that. But I also think Donald Trump is a symbol of the populist wave, at least when it comes to his willingness to go after companies like GM, companies like Carrier."

For her part, Renteria credits Sanders and Warren with having popularized tough anti-corporate rhetoric as a campaign strategy. But she also cautions that it might not work for everyone.

"For somebody like Elizabeth Warren, she has been in this space since the beginning of her career, and so for her it's just validating her brand," Renteria said.

That means calling out Amazon or Walmart seems authentic for candidates like Sanders, Warren and Trump. It might not have for a candidate like Hillary Clinton, and could be a stretch for other Democrats running in 2020.

"I think if other candidates were to take a look at this and go, 'Wow, I can do it too. It makes whatever policy I'm working on more concrete,' that could backfire," Renteria said.

In addition, there's the simple possibility that this kind of rhetoric could create powerful corporate enemies for a candidate at a time when unlimited money is pouring into the coffers of superPACs.

But then, an event like the Walmart shareholders' meeting does allow a candidate to have a media moment that an ordinary policy release might not create. And that's particularly important in a field of about two dozen candidates.

Walmart is one of NPR's financial sponsors.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.npr.org/2019/06/05/729735727/from-amazon-to-walmart-2020-candidates-take-on-big-corporations-by-name

2019-06-05 11:38:54Z
52780309120907