Kamis, 16 Mei 2019

Federal judge orders FDA to begin review of e-cigarettes - CNBC

A customer smokes an E-Cigarette at Digita Ciggz on January 28, 2015 in San Rafael, California.

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

A federal judge is siding with public health groups suing the Food and Drug Administration to begin reviewing thousands of e-cigarettes on the U.S. market.

The ruling handed down Wednesday in district court states that the agency shirked its legal duty when it postponed reviewing all U.S. vaping products by several years.

The American Academy of Pediatrics, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids and other groups filed the federal lawsuit in Maryland last year. The groups say the lack of FDA oversight has led to an explosion in underage vaping by teenagers, threatening to hook a generation of Americans on nicotine.

"It is now the FDA's responsibility to take immediate action to protect our kids and require manufacturers to apply to the FDA if they want to keep their products on the market," the groups said in a statement.

E-cigarettes are nicotine-emitting devices that have grown into a multibillion-dollar industry in the U.S. despite little research on their long-term health effects, including whether they are useful in helping smokers quit cigarettes.

The FDA gained authority to regulate the products in 2016, but it has allowed thousands of products to remain on the market without formal rules or product standards. The agency says that both FDA staff and manufacturers need more time to prepare for regulation.

The public health groups have warned that the lack of oversight could undo decades of anti-tobacco efforts as young people migrate toward newer vaping products.

U.S. Judge Paul Grimm agreed, calling the FDA's delay "so extreme as to amount to an abdication of its statutory responsibilities."

FDA spokesman Michael Felberbaum said in an emailed statement that the agency is reviewing the court decision and "will continue to tackle the troubling epidemic of e-cigarette use among kids." The agency will have the option of appealing the decision.

Gregory Conley of the American Vaping Association said the government "must appeal this ruling" to "protect adult access to less harmful alternatives to cigarettes."

Under President Donald Trump's FDA commissioner, Scott Gottlieb — who departed last month — the FDA said it would not require e-cigarette manufacturers to submit their products for review until 2022. Shortly before stepping down Gottlieb moved the deadline up to 2021.

But Grimm's ruling suggests the FDA must move much faster. He calls for the health groups and the FDA to submit plans for moving forward with product reviews within 30 days.

Wednesday's ruling follows a similar decision last September, when a federal judge said the FDA must move ahead with adding graphic warning labels to cigarette packs. The FDA was required to take that step under a 2009 law, but the process has been bogged down by legal challenges from tobacco companies.

"The courts are clearly pushing FDA — at behest of medical and consumer groups — to step up their regulatory pressure on industry," said Marc Scheineson, a former FDA official who now advises companies with the law firm Alston & Bird.

Scheineson said he expects the FDA to argue that it doesn't have the resources to process the flood of applications that industry would submit if the ruling is enforced.

The FDA and most health experts agree that e-cigarettes are likely less harmful than traditional cigarettes because they don't produce the cancer-causing byproducts of burning tobacco. But there is little research on their long-term health effects, particularly for young people.

Nicotine is what makes both cigarettes and e-cigarettes addictive, and health experts say the chemical is harmful to developing brains.

Separately on Wednesday, North Carolina's attorney general announced the first state lawsuit against e-cigarette giant Juul, which dominates the U.S. vaping market.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/16/federal-judge-orders-fda-to-begin-review-of-e-cigarettes.html

2019-05-16 04:10:24Z
52780297140852

Federal judge orders FDA to begin review of e-cigarettes - CNBC

A customer smokes an E-Cigarette at Digita Ciggz on January 28, 2015 in San Rafael, California.

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

A federal judge is siding with public health groups suing the Food and Drug Administration to begin reviewing thousands of e-cigarettes on the U.S. market.

The ruling handed down Wednesday in district court states that the agency shirked its legal duty when it postponed reviewing all U.S. vaping products by several years.

The American Academy of Pediatrics, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids and other groups filed the federal lawsuit in Maryland last year. The groups say the lack of FDA oversight has led to an explosion in underage vaping by teenagers, threatening to hook a generation of Americans on nicotine.

"It is now the FDA's responsibility to take immediate action to protect our kids and require manufacturers to apply to the FDA if they want to keep their products on the market," the groups said in a statement.

E-cigarettes are nicotine-emitting devices that have grown into a multibillion-dollar industry in the U.S. despite little research on their long-term health effects, including whether they are useful in helping smokers quit cigarettes.

The FDA gained authority to regulate the products in 2016, but it has allowed thousands of products to remain on the market without formal rules or product standards. The agency says that both FDA staff and manufacturers need more time to prepare for regulation.

The public health groups have warned that the lack of oversight could undo decades of anti-tobacco efforts as young people migrate toward newer vaping products.

U.S. Judge Paul Grimm agreed, calling the FDA's delay "so extreme as to amount to an abdication of its statutory responsibilities."

FDA spokesman Michael Felberbaum said in an emailed statement that the agency is reviewing the court decision and "will continue to tackle the troubling epidemic of e-cigarette use among kids." The agency will have the option of appealing the decision.

Gregory Conley of the American Vaping Association said the government "must appeal this ruling" to "protect adult access to less harmful alternatives to cigarettes."

Under President Donald Trump's FDA commissioner, Scott Gottlieb — who departed last month — the FDA said it would not require e-cigarette manufacturers to submit their products for review until 2022. Shortly before stepping down Gottlieb moved the deadline up to 2021.

But Grimm's ruling suggests the FDA must move much faster. He calls for the health groups and the FDA to submit plans for moving forward with product reviews within 30 days.

Wednesday's ruling follows a similar decision last September, when a federal judge said the FDA must move ahead with adding graphic warning labels to cigarette packs. The FDA was required to take that step under a 2009 law, but the process has been bogged down by legal challenges from tobacco companies.

"The courts are clearly pushing FDA — at behest of medical and consumer groups — to step up their regulatory pressure on industry," said Marc Scheineson, a former FDA official who now advises companies with the law firm Alston & Bird.

Scheineson said he expects the FDA to argue that it doesn't have the resources to process the flood of applications that industry would submit if the ruling is enforced.

The FDA and most health experts agree that e-cigarettes are likely less harmful than traditional cigarettes because they don't produce the cancer-causing byproducts of burning tobacco. But there is little research on their long-term health effects, particularly for young people.

Nicotine is what makes both cigarettes and e-cigarettes addictive, and health experts say the chemical is harmful to developing brains.

Separately on Wednesday, North Carolina's attorney general announced the first state lawsuit against e-cigarette giant Juul, which dominates the U.S. vaping market.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/16/federal-judge-orders-fda-to-begin-review-of-e-cigarettes.html

2019-05-16 03:39:23Z
52780297140852

Rabu, 15 Mei 2019

Macy's CEO says it's 'hard to find a path' where tariffs on clothes, shoes wouldn't hurt shoppers - CNBC

Macy's CEO Jeff Gennette says an increase in tariffs to 25% on $300 billion in Chinese goods that's still being considered by the White House, which would impact apparel and footwear, would likely trickle down and hit consumers.

"When you do the math, it's hard to find a path through that wouldn't impact customers," he said. "It will affect a lot of apparel and accessories categories," for both Macy's in-house brands and national labels, Gennette added. It would be hard for Macy's to get to a place "where you don't have a customer impact," he reiterated.

He made the comments after Macy's reported first-quarter earnings that topped analysts' expectations. But sales fell from a year ago, as Macy's is still struggling — like many apparel-focused and mall-based retailers — to find ways to draw shoppers into stores, when they could just buy from Amazon.

Gennette went on to explain that the latest tariff hike, to 25% from 10%, on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods put into effect last Friday will hurt its furniture business, albeit not drastically.

"We have strategies to mitigate [the impact on shoppers]," he said. "We think those strategies will limit customer concern."

Macy's on Wednesday reaffirmed its profit outlook for 2019. But another round of tariffs could change that.

"This potential fourth tranche of tariffs was not contemplated when we provided the annual guidance," Gennette told analysts during a conference call.

Macy's shares, which initially surged 7% in premarket trading Wednesday, were last up about 1.5%.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/15/macys-ceo-says-tariffs-on-clothes-shoes-would-hurt-shoppers.html

2019-05-15 15:20:17Z
52780297401905

It's National Chocolate Chip Day & You Can Get Free Cookies - HotNewHipHop

Earlier this week, we reported on Häagen-Dazs' earth-friendly initiative. The company behind the delicious frozen deserts announced they would be giving away a free ice cream cone upon purchase at any of their chosen locations. The latter was to support efforts to protect the honey-bee, an insect currently on the verge of extinction due to climate change and the over-use of pesticides. As such, the company offered threats to its clients with the hope of raising awareness for the beloved honey-bees. While Häagen-Dazs gave you both a delicious treat and opportunity to make a difference in the world, today's news is simply for the benefit of your belly.

It is officially National Chocolate Chip Day and brands are offering free cookies. Even Cookie Monster's official Twitter released a statement to celebrate the holiday. As such, Nestle Tollhouse Cafe locations are giving away freebies today. Precisely, every customer can get a free chocolate chip cookie and so without having to make any purchases whatsoever. Just hit up one of the 140 locations. Potbelly Sandwich Shop is also offering a free cookie, with the purchase of any items on Wednesday, May 15th. So make sure you head over before they run out. 

Happy National Chocolate Chip Day!

[Via]

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/its-national-chocolate-chip-day-and-you-can-get-free-cookies-news.80239.html

2019-05-15 14:28:00Z
CAIiEJfWgcHya2KTApR32TL5gmsqGQgEKhAIACoHCAowruP-CjC9pfcCMPq74wU

Ford urges Ranger, Fusion drivers to use parking brake to prevent unexpected roll - Detroit Free Press

Drivers of the new Ranger midsize pickup truck, along with owners of the 2013-16 Fusion sedan, may think their vehicle is safely in the "park" position when it is not and may roll unexpectedly.

Consumers have reported property damage and an injury related to the Fusion defect, Ford said.

The company Wednesday issued a recall for about 270,000 Fusions and 2,760 Rangers in North America.

On some affected Rangers, the two fasteners that secure the transmission shift cable bracket to the transmission housing may not have been torqued to specification, the company said. Over time, the cable bracket can loosen and the transmission would be in a different gear than the gearshift selected by the driver.

"This condition could allow the driver to remove the ignition key (if equipped) with no instrument panel warning message or chime indicating that the transmission is not in park. This could allow unintended vehicle movement or roll away if the parking brake is not applied, increasing the risk of a crash or injury," Ford said in a statement.

The Dearborn-based automaker is not aware of any accidents or injuries related to this condition at this time.

Approximately 2,500 Rangers in the U.S. and its territories and some 260 in Canada are affected. They were built at the Michigan Assembly Plant from March 5-13, 2019, Ford said.

Ranger owners are urged to go to dealers so that the vehicles will adjust the fasteners and verify everything is safe. Drivers are urged to use the parking brake at all times until the recall has been done. The recall reference number is 19S15.

"A recall on an all-new vehicle isn’t uncommon," said Karl Brauer, executive publisher of Kelley Blue Book. "It’s happened in the last 12 months on multiple new cars or SUVs, including models from Europe and Asia. This Ranger recall is fairly straightforward and should be easy to fix and verify. The challenging part of this recall, like all vehicle recalls, is getting the information to affected owners and having them respond in a timely manner."

Injury reported

Ford also issued a safety alert for its 2013-16 Fusion midsize sedans with 2.5-liter engines for similar problems.

Fusion drivers may shift their lever into park and remove the ignition key but the transmission is actually not in park, with no warning message or audible chime, Ford said in its recall alert. If the parking brake is not applied, a shift cable that detaches from the transmission could allow the car to roll, increasing the risk of injury or crash, Ford said.

The problem? Bushing that attaches the shifter cable may degrade and detach from the transmission.

Ford is aware of three reports of property damage and one report of an injury potentially related to this condition.

The Fusion recall impacts approximately 270,000 vehicles in North America, including 259,182 in the U.S. and its territories,10,282 in Canada and 3,765 in Mexico.

The Fusions affected were built at Flat Rock Assembly Plant from April 12, 2013-Feb. 29, 2016, and at the Hermosillo Assembly Plant in Mexico from Feb. 9, 2012-April 4, 2016.

The root cause is in the process of being confirmed, Ford said. Dealers and Fusion owners will be instructed to always use the parking brake, and they will be notified when the final remedy is available, the company said. The Ford reference number for this recall is 19S16.

Industry analysts said few consumers will pay attention to the latest alert or others in the future.

"Recalls are such a common occurrence these days that the public has largely grown immune to them," said John McElroy, longtime industry observer and host of "Autoline After Hours."

"Many people ignore recall notices, even ones that involve safety hazards. Millions of car owners have ignored the Takata airbag recall, even though it essentially involves a hand grenade that could go off in their face," he said. "Ford’s latest recall will not even achieve 15 minutes of fame."

More: 272,760 Ford Fusions, new Ranger pickups get recalled for unexpected roll

More: 2019 Ford Ranger truck buyers want custom design, sexy 'black package'

More: Ford Ranger demand means 'massive overtime' to boost production

More: How Ford and the UAW cut a deal to bring Ranger back to the U.S.

Contact Phoebe Wall Howard at 313-222-6512 or phoward@freepress.com. Follow her on Twitter @phoebesaid. Read more on Ford and sign up for our autos newsletter.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.freep.com/story/money/cars/ford/2019/05/15/ford-recall-ranger-fusion-transmission/3677845002/

2019-05-15 14:34:00Z
CBMiaWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZyZWVwLmNvbS9zdG9yeS9tb25leS9jYXJzL2ZvcmQvMjAxOS8wNS8xNS9mb3JkLXJlY2FsbC1yYW5nZXItZnVzaW9uLXRyYW5zbWlzc2lvbi8zNjc3ODQ1MDAyL9IBJGh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLmZyZWVwLmNvbS9hbXAvMzY3Nzg0NTAwMg

FCC proposes blocking robocalls by default - Engadget

Sponsored Links

ASSOCIATED PRESS

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has been fighting robocalls for years, but as anyone with a cell phone can tell you, they're still getting through. Now, the Commission wants to make it legal for phone companies to block unwanted robocalls by default. Chairman Anji Pai has circulated a declaratory ruling that, if adopted, would give carriers permission to develop new call blocking tools. The ruling could also allow consumers to prohibit calls from numbers that aren't on their contact lists.

The proposed change targets spam robocalls that hijack legitimate, in-service numbers. Carriers like Comcast, T-Mobile, AT&T and Verizon are working to deploy STIR/SHAKEN technology that labels calls from authentic numbers. But the FCC says many voice providers have held off on developing call blocking tools because it was unclear whether those tools were legal under FCC rules.

"By making it clear that such call blocking is allowed, the FCC will give voice service providers the legal certainty they need to block unwanted calls from the outset so that consumers never have to get them," Pai said. If adopted, this ruling could lead to new call blocking tools, like those used by third-party apps. The systems would include protections against blocking emergency calls, and consumers would be able to opt-out of call blocking if they wish.

Don't expect robocalls to disappear immediately. The FCC will consider the proposal at its June 6th meeting, and if approved, it's hard to say when this will go into effect.

Verizon owns Engadget's parent company, Verizon Media. Rest assured, Verizon has no control over our coverage. Engadget remains editorially independent.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.engadget.com/2019/05/15/fcc-robocall-blocking-default/

2019-05-15 13:58:17Z
52780297329523

US seeks new tools to counter unrelenting wave of robocalls - KOMO News

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. US seeks new tools to counter unrelenting wave of robocalls  KOMO News
  2. FCC proposes blocking robocalls by default  Engadget
  3. Ajit Pai proposes new rule that would allow carriers to block robocalls  The Verge
  4. FCC to consider allowing carriers to block robocalls by default | TheHill  The Hill
  5. FCC ready to let phone companies use tools to block robocalls  Reuters
  6. View full coverage on Google News

http://komonews.com/news/consumer/us-seeks-new-tools-to-counter-unrelenting-wave-of-robocalls

2019-05-15 13:53:00Z
52780297329523