Selasa, 14 Mei 2019

Roundup weedkiller cancer claim: Bayer to appeal latest verdict - Axios

Bayer said Monday it would appeal an Oakland, California, jury's decision to award more than $2 billion in damages to a couple it found contracted cancer after being exposed to Roundup weed killer for over 30 years.

Why it matters: Alva and Alberta Pilliod's case marks the 3rd verdict against Roundup weed killer to have been brought by people who contracted cancer. Bayer, which acquired Monsanto last year, faces more than 13,400 U.S. lawsuits over allegations that the herbicide is a cancer risk, per Reuters. It denies the product's a health hazard.

The backdrop: In March, a federal jury in San Francisco said Bayer must pay roughly $80 million in damages to a California man after exposure to Roundup. The company was ordered to pay $78.6 million in damages over a 2018 case.

The big picture: The Environmental Protection Authority says that glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, does not cause cancer or other health risks if it is used according to instructions, something Bayer noted in its statement responding to the latest finding.

"We have great sympathy for Mr. and Mrs. Pilliod, but the evidence in this case was clear that both have long histories of illnesses known to be substantial risk factors for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), most NHL has no known cause, and there is not reliable scientific evidence to conclude that glyphosate-based herbicides were the 'but for' cause of their illnesses as the jury was required to find in this case.
"The contrast between today's verdict and EPA's conclusion that there are 'no risks to public health from the current registered uses of glyphosate' could not be more stark."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.axios.com/roundup-weedkiller-cancer-claim-bayer-to-appeal-1d50f2da-c59d-4f63-a290-17af959e26d8.html

2019-05-14 08:39:00Z
52780295644429

Walmart announces next-day delivery, firing back at Amazon - CNBC

Walmart announces same-day delivery for shoppers' orders more than $35.

Source: Walmart

Walmart is firing back.

The biggest retailer in the world will now offer shoppers the option to have their online orders delivered the next day, following Amazon on April 25 promising one-day delivery for all Amazon Prime members and spending $800 million to improve its delivery infrastructure to make this possible.

Walmart on Tuesday is beginning its rollout of next-day delivery, starting in Phoenix and Las Vegas, the company announced in a blog post. The option will be available in Southern California over the next few days. And it will expand to reach roughly 75% of American consumers by the end of 2019, including 40 of the top 50 major metros in the U.S., according to Walmart.

Amazon hasn't yet detailed a timeline for its own rollout of next-day shipping. But even before its April announcement, the company had offered same-day and two-hour delivery for Prime members in certain markets, for certain products and at an additional cost. Amazon's next-day shipping plan expands the number of items and ZIP codes eligible for expedited service.

Walmart isn't disclosing the cost of its latest delivery push. But the company says it's been working on it for quite some time.

In January 2017, Walmart started offering free, two-day shipping for orders totaling more than $35, dropping its minimum purchase threshold, which had been $50 up until then. It had already bought Jet.com for $3 billion in 2016 to juice its online business and compete with Amazon. That deal helped it reach shoppers in bigger cities, like New York, in less time.

"We have been working on this for the past several years," Marc Lore, the head of Walmart's e-commerce business in the U.S., said about the move toward next-day shipping. "We've been investing ... and now we are in the position to reap the benefits."

To start, next-day delivery will be available for roughly 220,000 items "most frequently purchased" online, Walmart said, including toys and electronics. The company said it plans to make more items available to ship next-day over time. And the option is only free for orders over $35. Amazon, for comparison, has no minimum purchase threshold for free, next-day delivery but requires customers to have a Prime membership, which costs $119 annually.

"This is the future of the Walmart.com supply chain," Lore said. "The more products we add to this experience ... the more profitable the orders will be."

When Amazon made its one-day shipping the new standard for all Prime customers last month it sent shares of Walmart and Target tumbling, as investors worried bricks-and-mortar retailers would now have to spend more money to match the e-commerce giant's steps.

"It's this nebulous thing called the Amazon effect," said John Bonno, a managing director in the retail practice at AlixPartners. "I think retailers are so afraid. ... [They're] so nervous that any new service that Amazon offers, retailers feel they need to go through hoops," to match it, he said.

Buy online, pick up at the store

That said, companies like Walmart and Target have something Amazon doesn't have — networks of thousands of stores across the country. Stores help these companies offer a click-and-collect option, where a customer can place an order online, drive to the store, and pick it up that same day. Walmart, for example, says it's on track to offer pickup for online grocery orders at 3,100 stores, and same-day grocery delivery from 1,600 locations, by the end of the year.

"Walmart wants to make the promise they are doing everything they can to be as convenient as possible," said Laura Kennedy, a retail analyst for consulting group Kantar. "They have to meet shoppers' expectations. ... Amazon has set those for the last 10 to 15 years."

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos (l) and Doug McMillon, CEO of Walmart.

Getty Images | CNBC

A recent report from UBS estimated it would cost Walmart $215 million in incremental investments, based on the company's e-commerce revenues, to match Amazon's one-day shipping offering. UBS added this would be "quite manageable" for Walmart to achieve.

Lore had told analysts during a meeting last fall that Walmart was already capable of reaching 87% of the country with next-day delivery.

Meantime, Amazon is already capable of offering same-day and one-day delivery to 72% of the total U.S. population, according to RBC Capital Markets.

Lore explained the push toward one-day delivery ultimately makes "good business sense" for Walmart. He said this means shoppers will start to receive all of their items in one box — because with next-day delivery, each order is going to be sourced from the nearest distribution center, and only that one.

If a shopper wants a pack of diapers, a Star Wars toy, a coffee mug and a pair of headphones delivered the next day, for example, all of these items will need to be available at one warehouse. If one item isn't available, the shopper will be presented with the option to "save it for later," and order the others for the following day. Or, the shopper can still order everything — likely receiving the shipment in multiple boxes — for two-day delivery, or beyond. (Cut-off times for next-day deliveries will vary by market, Walmart said.)

Walmart has done "extensive work" to make sure it has the right items at the right fulfillment centers, Lore said. The company isn't planning to source next-day shipments from its stores.

Just a fad?

Not everyone is buying into next-day delivery being the next big thing for retailers.

If Walmart finds out this effort isn't profitable, the company will stop offering it, said Sucharita Kodali, a retail analyst at Forrester Research. She compared it to when Amazon started offering overnight delivery on shoes to compete with Zappos.com. Then Amazon bought Zappos. "It was an unsustainable arms race ... and eventually they just stopped," she said.

"Something like next-day delivery is a short-term burst of excitement. It's great for shoppers. ... Customers win when Walmart and Amazon are duking it out. But is it long term?" Kodali asked. "At the macro-economic level, it's not sustainable."

Instead, she thinks more retailers should lean into offering buy-online-pick-up-in-store options, utilizing their real estate and saving on shipping expenses.

A recent survey from Coresight Research found roughly 46% of online shoppers in the U.S. had picked up an internet order from a bricks-and-mortar store in the past 12 months. The top retailers with this option were Walmart, Target, Best Buy and Home Depot, Coresight said.

"Consumers actually like shopping [with click and collect]," Kodali said. Retailers "should've realized this years ago."

Target which offers free, two-day shipping for all of its credit card holders, with no minimum purchase requirement now has a curbside pickup option for shoppers at over 1,250 stores. It offers in-store pickup for online orders at all of its 1,850 locations.

Amazon, still in its race to get boxes to customers as fast as possible, on Monday said it will start giving its current employees up to $10,000 in start-up costs to quit their jobs and form businesses delivering Amazon packages. If accepted into the program, the delivery helpers will be able to lease vans from Amazon. The offer is open to most part- and full-time Amazon employees, the company said, but not to Whole Foods workers.

Amazon shares are up about 21% so far this year, while Walmart shares are up 7%, and Target shares have climbed roughly 8%.

— CNBC's Michael Bloom contributed to this reporting.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/13/walmart-announces-next-day-delivery-firing-back-at-amazon.html

2019-05-14 04:08:16Z
52780295897709

Senin, 13 Mei 2019

Supreme Court rules against Apple in App Store antitrust case - CNBC

The Supreme Court on Monday ruled 5-4 against Apple in a case involving its signature electronic marketplace, the App Store, allowing iPhone users to move forward with an antitrust suit against the company. 

The iPhone users argued that Apple's 30% commission on sales through the App Store is an unfair use of monopoly power that results in inflated prices passed on to consumers.

Apple argued that only app developers, and not users, should be able to bring such a lawsuit. But the Supreme Court, in an opinion authored by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, rejected that claim. 

"Apple's line-drawing does not make a lot of sense, other than as a way to gerrymander Apple out of this and similar lawsuits," Kavanaugh wrote.

Shares of Apple, already battered by trade concerns, were down more than 5%, lagging the broader market.

The result was widely expected after arguments in November in the case, Apple v. Pepper, during which the justices seemed skeptical of Apple's arguments. 

The case split President Donald Trump's two nominees to the high court. In a dissent joined by his fellow conservatives, Justices John Roberts, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote that the majority created an "artificial rule."

The legal battle over the company's online marketplace has dragged on for nearly a decade.

The result of the iPhone users' litigation could affect the way that Apple, as well as other companies that operate electronic marketplaces like Facebook, Amazon and Alphabet's Google, structure their businesses. For Apple, hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties could hang on the outcome.

Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Read the full opinion below: 

This is breaking news. Check back for updates.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/13/supreme-court-rules-against-apple-in-app-store-antitrust-case.html

2019-05-13 14:47:23Z
52780295085867

Dow plunges nearly 600 points as investors fear escalating trade war threatens economy - The Washington Post

U.S. markets plunged Monday as China said it would raise steep tariffs on $60 billion in U.S. goods, raising the stakes of a trade war that threatens to imperil the global economy.

The Dow Jones industrial average fell more than 590 points, more than 2 percent, in morning trading as investors feared that a trade standoff with China could escalate into a full-blown economic crisis — dragging the U.S. and world economies into recession. Dragging the Dow were Apple, Caterpillar and Boeing. The blue chip index was headed for its lowest close since January.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 index was down 2.25 percent and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite fell nearly 3 percent, continuing last week’s losses. Eight out of 11 market sectors were in negative territory an hour after U.S. markets opened. Utilities, real estate and consumer discretionary were the only bright spots.

Both S&P and Nasdaq were on track for their lowest close since March. Stocks were seeing their biggest decline since Jan. 3.

“Today’s tit-for-tat in U.S./China trade tariffs has exacerbated tumbling futures out of fear that tensions could trigger a global recession,” said Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at CFRA Research.

The drama began last week after President Trump last week imposed a 25 percent tariff on $200 billion of Chinese imports to the United States. He also told aides to begin plans to hit more than $300 billion in other Chinese goods.

Asian markets were down more than 1 percent on China’s response, with the Shanghai Composite dropping 1.2 percent and Japan’s Nikkei 225 down just shy of 1 percent. European markets were down across the board, with the German Dax leading the drop, off 1.5 percent. France’s CAC had fallen 1.2 percent and the Pan European Stoxx 600 was off 1.2 percent.

Adding to the pressure on stocks was a Saudi news report that said two Saudi oil tankers had been attacked with “significant damage” in coastal waters near the Persian Gulf, heightening tensions with Iran.

The tankers were subjected to an “act of sabotage” early Sunday morning in waters off the coast of the United Arab Emirates, according to a statement by the Saudi Minister for Energy, Industry and Mineral Resources, Khalid Al-Falih carried by the official Saudi news agency.

Saudi Arabia did not say who was responsible for the attack, which caused no casualties or oil spill, according to the statement.

Oil futures rose on the news, with U.S. benchmark West Texas Intermediate climbing 1.6 percent and Brent crude up nearly 2 percent.

“Stock investors are in risk-off mode this morning as Trump’s trade war with China seems to be escalating while negotiations seem to be breaking down,” said Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research. “Adding to the geopolitical tumult is mounting tension in the Middle East following the sabotaging of Saudi oil tankers over the weekend.”

The president has alleged that the Chinese government is ripping off U.S. consumers and businesses by unfairly subsidizing Chinese companies, stealing intellectual property from U.S. firms, and flooding global markets with cheap goods to put other companies out of business.

On Monday, he warned China against retaliation on tariffs in a series of early morning tweets. But China countered with its own tariffs. The Chinese government said it would impose tariffs on U.S. imports starting on June 1, with steepest penalties hitting certain beef, live plants, dyed flowers, and a range of fruits and vegetables. The tariffs would range from 5 percent to 25 percent.

Technology stocks were taking a hit Monday, with all five FAANG stocks - Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix and Google parent Alphabet - in the red.

Apple shares were off nearly 5 percent because of the risk that a China trade war would hurt Apple revenue in that country. The shares also were reacting to a Supreme Court ruling on Monday that allows iPhone users to sue the phone giant over the prices at its App Store.

Another high profile technology company, Uber Technologies Inc. shares fell $3, more than 7 percent, Monday in its second day of trading. The ride-hailing company debuted Friday at a price of $45 per share. Shares in the company, which is the most anticipated initial public offering of the year, are 15 percent off their opening price on Friday.

x

Monday’s skid comes on the heels of the first weekly decline of 2019 in U.S. stocks.

The S&P 500 eked out a gain Friday on speculation the escalation won’t derail global economic growth, paring its loss for the week to 2.2 percent. That’s the steepest drop since the five days ended Dec. 21, when stocks were tumbling toward the brink of a bear market. The Dow Jones industrial average dropped 2.1 percent to 25,942. Apple Inc. was among the worst decliners in the 30-member gauge as the iPhone maker’s close ties to China put its profits at particular risk. The Nasdaq Composite Index fell 3 percent.

The sell-off started Monday after Trump’s weekend tweets threatening to more than double tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese goods, which he then followed through on. Equities staged a late-day comeback Friday on renewed optimism that an all-out trade war can be averted.

Stocks in all 11 major industry groups ended last week lower, with technology and industrial companies sinking the most as Beijing promised to retaliate against the fresh U.S. tariffs.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/05/13/dow-plunges-points-market-open-investors-fear-escalating-trade-war-threatens-economy/

2019-05-13 14:15:00Z
52780294255479

Supreme Court rules against Apple in App Store antitrust case - CNBC

The Supreme Court on Monday ruled 5-4 against Apple in a case involving its signature electronic marketplace, the App Store, allowing iPhone users to move forward with an antitrust suit against the company. 

The iPhone users argued that Apple's 30% commission on sales through the App Store is an unfair use of monopoly power that results in inflated prices passed on to consumers.

Apple argued that only app developers, and not users, should be able to bring such a lawsuit. But the Supreme Court, in an opinion authored by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, rejected that claim. 

"Apple's line-drawing does not make a lot of sense, other than as a way to gerrymander Apple out of this and similar lawsuits," Kavanaugh wrote.

Shares of Apple, already battered by trade concerns, were down more than 5%, lagging the broader market.

The result was widely expected after arguments in November in the case, Apple v. Pepper, during which the justices seemed skeptical of Apple's arguments. 

The case split President Donald Trump's two nominees to the high court. In a dissent joined by his fellow conservatives, Justices John Roberts, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote that the majority created an "artificial rule."

The legal battle over the company's online marketplace has dragged on for nearly a decade.

The result of the iPhone users' litigation could affect the way that Apple, as well as other companies that operate electronic marketplaces like Facebook, Amazon and Alphabet's Google, structure their businesses. For Apple, hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties could hang on the outcome.

Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Read the full opinion below: 

This is breaking news. Check back for updates.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/13/supreme-court-rules-against-apple-in-app-store-antitrust-case.html

2019-05-13 14:07:02Z
52780295085867

Bed Bath & Beyond CEO out amid ongoing activist pressure - Chain Store Age

C-SUITE

The longtime chief executive of Bed Bath & Beyond has stepped down amid ongoing pressure from activist investors who blame him for the chain’s faltering performance and are pushing for changes.

The home goods chain announced that Steven Temares has stepped down as CEO and resigned as a member of the board, effective immediately. Mary Winston, who recently joined the board, has been appointed interim chief while the company searches for a permanent replacement. In addition, new board member Andrea Weiss, a longtime retail executive and consultant, will oversee the company’s strategy and business transformation plans and work closely with Winston.

Winston’s previous retail experience includes serving as executive VP and CFO of Family Dollar Stores Inc. and senior VP and CFO of Giant Eagle. She also served as executive VP and CFO at Scholastic Corporation. In searching for a permanent leader, Bed Bath & Beyond said it will focus on individuals who have transformation and innovation experience “in the retail sector.

“Bed Bath & Beyond has a significant opportunity to drive value creation by building on its great brands and strong customer affinity,” said Patrick Gaston, independent chairman of the board. “As the company continues its efforts to improve its financial performance and enhance its competitive position, the board determined that now is the right time to identify the next generation of leadership.”

Temares, a 27-year Bed Bath & Beyond veteran, has been CEO of the chain since 2003. The management shake-up comes as Bed Bath & Beyond has been under mounting pressure from a group of activist investors — Legion Partners Asset Management, Macellum Advisors and Ancora Advisors — to replace the entire board and to oust Temares. The group has been outspoken in its criticism of Bed Bath & Beyond ‘s performance and recently released a 100-plus page document that detailed Bed Bath & Beyond’s “stale retail perspective” and called for the immediate removal of Temares, blaming him for more than a decade of underperformance.

Prior to releasing the document, the group launched an effort to replace Bed Bath & Beyond’s entire 12-person board with a slate of 16 nominees. In response, the chain announced that two members would depart the board, decreasing the size to 10. (The retailer noted that with the departure of Temares, the board goes down to nine members). investors labeled the move as “too little, too late.” Last week, Legion Partners filed a lawsuit against Bed Bath & Beyond, saying that the company bypassed shareholder rights in overhauling the slate of directors.

Analyst Neil Saunders, managing director of GlobalData Retail, commented that the resignation of Temares as CEO is a “necessary first step in revitalizing the fortunes of the beleaguered retailer.” He noted that under Temares, the chain lost market share as it fell behind peers and failed to keep pace with a changing homewares market.

“However, as we have said before, shuffling the management team will not, in and of itself, produce the change that is required,” Saunders said. “As such, Bed Bath & Beyond now needs to search for a leader who can put in place a plan to refashion the company to the modern realities of retailing.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.chainstoreage.com/c-suite-1/bed-bath-beyond-ceo-out-amid-ongoing-activist-pressure/

2019-05-13 14:03:15Z
52780295136923

Stocks - Wall Street Slides as China Increases Tariffs in Trade Retaliation - Investing.com

© Reuters.  © Reuters.

Investing.com - U.S. stock markets opened sharply lower on Monday as China announced countermeasures against the U.S. in an escalating trade dispute.

Beijing indicated plans to beginning on June 1 in response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s instructions to Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer to prepare 25% tariffs on virtually all Chinese products imported to the U.S., including those which were not currently covered by existing levies.

That presidential order came after the U.S. increased tariffs last Friday on $200 billion of Chinese imports to 25% from 10%.

Fears that the growing escalation of the Sino-U.S. trade dispute threatens to derail the global economy shook risk assets on Monday.

The tumbled 457 points, or 1.8%, to 25,485.76 points by 9:33 AM ET (13:33 GMT), while the sank 52 points, or 1.8%, 2,829.38 points and the tech-heavy slid 179 points, or 2.3%, 7,738.33 points.

Hu Xijin, editor-in-chief of China’s state-controlled Global Times, singled out Boeing among the Dow components likely to be targeted by the new round of tariffs.

“China may stop purchasing U.S. agricultural products and energy, reduce Boeing orders and restrict U.S. service trade with China,” he said in a tweet, adding that Chinese authorities could also consider dumping their holdings of U.S. Treasuries.

Shares of Boeing (NYSE:) sank 3.4%, topped only by the 4.7% decline in Apple (NASDAQ:), for whom China is an increasingly important market, and a 3.6% slide in industrial global bellwether Caterpillar (NYSE:).

With no major economic data or company reports scheduled for Monday, trade will be driven by any developments with regard to the ongoing dispute.

“Lacking recent precedents, stocks are missing an anchor in the midst of escalating China-U.S. trade tensions,” Mohamed El-Erian, chief economist at Allianz, said via Twitter. “As such, they continue to react to every statement from government officials.”

Outside of equities, the , which measures the greenback against six rival currencies, lost 0.3% at 96.83 by 9:35 AM ET (13:35 GMT), while the fell 4 basis points to a six-week low of 2.41%.

In commodities, rose $12.25, or 1.0%, to $1,299.75 a troy ounce, while jumped $1.50 cents, or 2.4% to $63.16 a barrel.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/stocks--wall-street-slides-as-china-increases-tariffs-in-trade-retaliation-1866171

2019-05-13 13:37:00Z
52780294255479